瞿建宇
中国医学科学院阜外医院 心血管外科
BACKGROUND:Lipoprotein(a) is a possible causal risk factor for atherosclerosis and related complications. The distribution and prognostic implication of lipoprotein(a) in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting remain unknown. This study aimed to assess the impact of high lipoprotein(a) on the long-term prognosis of patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting.METHODS AND RESULTS:Consecutive patients with stable coronary artery disease who underwent isolated coronary artery bypass grafting from January 2013 to December 2018 from a single-center cohort were included. The primary outcome was all-cause death. The secondary outcome was a composite of major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events. Of the 18 544 patients, 4072 (22.0%) were identified as the high-lipoprotein(a) group (≥50 mg/dL). During a median follow-up of 3.2 years, primary outcomes occurred in 587 patients. High lipoprotein(a) was associated with increased risk of all-cause death (high lipoprotein(a) versus low lipoprotein(a): adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 1.31 [95% CI, 1.09-1.59]; P=0.005; lipoprotein(a) per 1-mg/dL increase: aHR, 1.003 [95% CI, 1.001-1.006]; P=0.011) and major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (high lipoprotein(a) versus low lipoprotein(a): aHR, 1.18 [95% CI, 1.06-1.33]; P=0.004; lipoprotein(a) per 1-mg/dL increase: aHR, 1.002 [95% CI, 1.001-1.004]; P=0.002). The lipoprotein(a)-related risk was greater in patients with European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation <3, and tended to attenuate in patients receiving arterial grafts.CONCLUSIONS:More than 1 in 5 patients with stable coronary artery disease who underwent coronary artery bypass grafting were exposed to high lipoprotein(a), which is associated with higher risks of death and major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events. The adverse effects of lipoprotein(a) were more pronounced in patients with clinically low-risk profiles or not receiving arterial grafts.
Journal of the American Heart Association 2024
OBJECTIVES:The present study sought to compare postoperative bleeding and renal function in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease undergoing simultaneous hybrid coronary revascularization (HCR) and minimally invasive direct off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (MIDCABG).METHODS:The study retrospectively collected the data of 594 consecutive patients who underwent simultaneous HCR and 351 patients who underwent MIDCABG with planned staged HCR (MIDCABG first, then elective percutaneous coronary intervention) in Fuwai Hospital from June 2007 to December 2020. A total of 317 pairs of patients who were matched in a 1:1 ratio with propensity score matching were enrolled in this study. Bleeding and changes in renal function were compared between the 2 groups.RESULTS:Compared with patients who underwent MIDCABG, patients who underwent simultaneous HCR had significantly greater chest tube drainage on the day of the operation (492.7 ± 282.4 mL vs 441.0 ± 261.9 mL; P = .023), but no significant difference was detected in the total amount during the postoperative period (788.8 ± 458.9 mL vs 753.3 ± 409.8 mL; P = .74). The differences in re-exploration for bleeding (0.3% vs 1.6%; P = .13), blood transfusion (18.9% vs 16.4%; P = .13), acute kidney injury (23.3% vs 18.6%; P = .53), and in-hospital major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (including all-cause death, myocardial infarction, stroke, and repeated revascularization) (2.5% vs 1.9%; P = .67) between the 2 groups did not reach statistical significance.CONCLUSIONS:Compared with MIDCABG, simultaneous HCR (MIDCABG first, instant percutaneous coronary intervention) did not increase postoperative bleeding or the incidence of acute kidney injury.
The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery 2023
OBJECTIVE:The optimal preoperative antiplatelet strategy for patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) requiring surgical revascularization remains unclear because of competing risks of bleeding and ischemic events. We evaluated the effect of clopidogrel within 5 days before coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) on outcomes in patients with ACS.METHODS:Consecutive patients with ACS who underwent isolated CABG at a single center were included in this retrospective study. The primary outcome was a composite of death, myocardial infarction, and stroke within 30 days after surgery. Secondary outcomes were CABG-related major bleeding and perioperative transfusion. Inverse probability weighting using propensity score was performed to evaluate the risk-adjusted effect of preoperative clopidogrel on outcomes.RESULTS:Of 5543 patients with ACS, 820 (14.8%) patients continued clopidogrel within 5 days before CABG. After adjustment for differences in baseline factors, clopidogrel use ≤5 days before CABG was associated with significantly increased odds of the primary composite outcome (odds ratio [OR], 1.63; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.16-2.29; P = .005), stroke (OR, 3.13; 95% CI, 1.82-5.39; P < .001), major bleeding (OR, 2.01; 95% CI, 1.56-2.58; P < .001), and transfusion (OR, 2.05; 95% CI, 1.82-2.30; P < .001). The effects of preoperative clopidogrel use ≤5 days on primary outcome and major bleeding were greater in patients older than 65 years.CONCLUSIONS:Among patients with ACS undergoing CABG, clopidogrel therapy within 5 days before surgery was associated with increased odds of major cardiac and cerebrovascular events and bleeding complications than discontinuing clopidogrel for >5 days.
The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery 2022
Background The optimal antiplatelet therapy after coronary artery bypass grafting remains unclear. We evaluated the association of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) with clopidogrel plus aspirin and clinical outcomes among patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting. Methods and Results A total of 18 069 consecutive patients who underwent primary isolated coronary artery bypass grafting between 2013 and 2017 were identified from a contemporary registry, and 10 854 (60.1%) received DAPT with clopidogrel plus aspirin as determined by claimed prescriptions after surgery. Cox regression models with inverse probability of treatment weighting were used to examine the associations between DAPT and outcomes. Patients who received DAPT, compared with those who received aspirin monotherapy, had a lower incidence of a composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, stroke, or repeat revascularization at 6 months (2.9% versus 4.2%; inverse probability of treatment weighting-adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 0.65; 95% CI, 0.55-0.77; P<0.001) as well as death (HR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.41-0.90), myocardial infarction (HR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.40-0.74), and stroke (HR, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.46-0.74). The incidence of major bleeding did not differ significantly between the 2 groups (HR, 1.11; 95% CI, 0.69-1.78). Similar results were noted across multiple subgroups as well as when using different analytic methods. Conclusions Among patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting, DAPT with clopidogrel plus aspirin as secondary prevention was associated with reduced risk of major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events within 6 months as compared with aspirin monotherapy, and there was no significant increase in major bleeding.
Journal of the American Heart Association 2021
BACKGROUND:Studies found that patients who underwent coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) often fail to receive optimal evidence-based secondary prevention medications. We evaluated the effectiveness of a smartphone-based quality improvement effort on improving the prescription of medical therapies.METHODS:In this cluster-randomized controlled trial, 60 hospitals were randomized to a control arm (n = 30) or to an intervention arm using smartphone-based multifaceted quality improvement interventions (n = 30). The primary outcome was the prescription of statin. The secondary outcomes were prescription of beta-blocker, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor, or angiotensin receptor blocker (ACE inhibitor or ARB), and optimal medical therapy for eligible patients.RESULTS:Between June 1, 2015 and September 15, 2016, a total of 10,006 CABG patients were enrolled (5,653 in 26 intervention and 4,353 in 29 control hospitals, 5 hospitals withdrew). Statin prescribing rate was 87.8% in the intervention arm and 84.4% in the control arm. We saw no evidence of an effect of intervention on statin prescribing in the intention-to-treat analysis (odds ratio [OR], 1.31; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.68-2.54; P = .43) or in key patient subsets. The prescription rates of ACE inhibitor or ARB and optimal medical therapy were comparable between study groups, while beta-blocker was more often prescribed in the intervention arm. Post hoc analysis demonstrated a greater increase in statin prescribing rate over time in the intervention arm.CONCLUSIONS:A smartphone-based quality improvement intervention compared with usual care did not increase statin prescribing for patients who received CABG. New studies focusing on the best practice of this technique may be warranted.
American heart journal 2021
Coronary revascularization is the most important strategy for coronary artery disease. This review summarizes the current most prevalent approaches for coronary revascularization and discusses the evidence on the mechanisms, indications, techniques, and outcomes of these approaches. Targeting coronary thrombus, fibrinolysis is indicated for patients with diagnosed myocardial infarction and without high risk of severe hemorrhage. The development of fibrinolytic agents has improved the outcomes of ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Percutaneous coronary intervention has become the most frequently performed procedure for coronary artery disease. The evolution of stents plays an important role in the result of the procedure. Coronary artery bypass grafting is the most effective revascularization approach for stenotic coronary arteries. The choice of conduits and surgical techniques are important determinants of patient outcomes. Multidisciplinary decision-making should analyze current evidence, considering the clinical condition of patients, and determine the safety and necessity for coronary revascularization with either PCI or CABG. For coronary artery disease with more complex lesions like left main disease and multivessel disease, CABG results in more complete revascularization than PCI. Furthermore, comorbidities, such as heart failure and diabetes, are always correlated with adverse clinical events, and a routine invasive strategy should be recommended. For patients under revascularization, secondary prevention therapies are also of important value for the prevention of subsequent adverse events.
Advances in experimental medicine and biology 2020
OBJECTIVES:This study aimed to clarify the incidence of sinoatrial nodal artery (SANa) injury in thoracoscopic epicardial surgical ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) and its impact on postoperative outcomes, which have not been previously elucidated.METHODS:We enrolled 103 consecutively patients with AF who underwent thoracoscopic epicardial ablation at our institution. In these patients, we evaluated the postoperative incidence of SANa injury by using enhanced cardiac computed tomography. For patients with confirmed SANa injury, 3-day continuous electrocardiographic monitoring and exercise stress tests were performed to assess the sinus rhythm maintenance and sinus node function.RESULTS:Thirteen patients (12.6%) had a confirmed SANa injury (left anterior type in 6 patients, left posterior type in 2 patients and double-branch type in 5 patients). After a median follow-up of 24 months, the patients with SANa injury were not found to be associated with lower sinus rhythm maintenance (hazard ratio 1.09, 95% confidential interval 0.36-3.31) as compared with those without SANa injury after adjustment for patient characteristics. Sinus node function was evaluated in 7 patients with SANa injury who remained in sinus rhythm after the procedure, and no sinus node dysfunction was confirmed in the 3-day electrocardiographic monitoring and exercise stress tests at a median follow-up of 12 months.CONCLUSIONS:The prevalence of SANa injury in the patients who underwent thoracoscopic epicardial ablation for AF was relatively low, and the incidence of SANa injury was not associated with postoperative restoration of sinus rhythm and sinoatrial node dysfunction. More studies are required to better understand SANa injury.
European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery 2020
