李佳亮
山东大学齐鲁医院
OBJECTIVE:We retrospectively compared the clinical outcomes of self-expanding covered stents (CSs) and bare metal stents (BMSs) in the treatment of aortoiliac occlusive disease (AIOD) at a single center between 2016 and 2022.METHODS:All patients with AIOD receiving endovascular therapy at a single center from January 2016 to October 2022 were continuously analyzed, including patients with lesions of all classes according to the Trans-Atlantic Inter-Society Consensus II (TASC-II). Relevant clinical and baseline data were collected, and propensity score matching was performed to compare CSs and BMSs in terms of baseline characteristics, surgical factors, 30-day outcomes, 5-year primary patency, and limb salvage. The follow-up results were analyzed by Kaplan-Meier curves. Cox proportional hazard models were used to identify predictors of primary patency.RESULTS:A total of 209 patients with AIOD were enrolled in the study, including 135 patients (64.6%) in the CS group and 74 patients (35.4%) in the BMS group. Surgical success rates (100% vs 100%; P = 1.00), early (<30-day) mortality rates (0% vs 0%; P = 1.00), cumulative surgical complication rate (12.0% vs 8.0%; P = .891), 5-year primary patency rate (83.4% vs 86.9%; P = .330), secondary patency rate (96% vs 100%; P = .570), and limb salvage rate (100% vs 100%; P = 1.00) did not exhibit significant differences between the two groups. Patients in the CS group had a lower preoperative ankle-brachial index (0.48 ± 0.26 vs 0.52 ± 0.19; P = .032), more cases of complex AIOD (especially TASC D) (47.4% vs 9.5%; P < .001), more chronic total occlusive lesions (77.0% vs 31.1%; P < .001), and more severe calcification (20.7% vs 14.9%; P < .036). After propensity score matching, 50 patients (25 with CS and 25 with BMS) were selected. The results showed that only severe calcification (32.0% vs 8.0%; P = .034) and ankle-brachial index increase (0.45 ± 0.15 vs 0.41 ± 0.22; P = .038) were significantly different between the groups. In terms of surgical factors, patients in the CS group had more use of bilateral femoral or combined brachial artery percutaneous access (60.0% vs 12.0%; P < .001), more number of stents used (2.3 ± 1.2 vs 1.3 ± 0.7; P < .001), longer mean stent length (9.3 ± 3.3 vs 5.8 ± 2.6 cm; P < .001), and more catheter-directed thrombolysis treatment (32.0% vs 4.0%; P = .009). Multivariate Cox survival analysis showed that severe calcification (hazard ratio, 1.32; 95% confidence interval, 1.04-1.85; P = .048) was the only independent predictor of the primary patency rate.CONCLUSIONS:All patients with AIOD who underwent endovascular therapy were included and achieved good outcomes with both CSs and BMSs. The influence of confounding factors in the two groups was minimized by propensity score matching, and the 5-year patency rates were generally similar in the unmatched and matched cohorts. Postoperative hemodynamic improvement was more obvious in patients in the CS group. For more complex lesions, CS is recommended to be preferred. Especially for severe calcification lesions, which is the only independent predictor of primary patency, CS showed obvious advantages. Further studies with more samples are needed to investigate the role of stent types in AIOD treatment.
Journal of vascular surgery 2024
BACKGROUND:We sought to investigate the midterm results of kissing self-expanding covered stents (SECSs) for the reconstruction of aortic bifurcation in complex aortoiliac occlusive disease.METHODS:Data of consecutive patients who had undergone endovascular treatment for aortoiliac occlusive disease were screened. Only patients with TransAtlantic Inter-Society Consensus (TASC) class C and D lesions treated by bilateral iliac kissing stents (KSs) were included. Midterm primary patency, risk factors, and limb salvage rates were analyzed. Follow-up results were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier curves. Cox proportional hazards models were used to identify the predictors of primary patency.RESULTS:A total of 48 patients (95.8% men; mean age, 65.3 ± 10.2 years) were treated with kissing SECSs. Of them, 17 patients had TASC-II class C lesions and 31 had class D lesions. There were 38 total occlusive lesions, with a mean occlusive lesion length of 108.2 ± 57.3 mm. The overall mean lesion length was 140.3 ± 60.5 mm, and the mean length of implanted stents in the aortoiliac arteries was 141.9 ± 59.9 mm. The mean diameter of the deployed SECSs was 7.8 ± 0.5 mm. The mean follow-up time was 36.5 ± 15.8 months, and the follow-up rate was 95.8%. At 36 months, the overall primary patency, assisted primary patency, secondary patency, and limb salvage rates were 92.2%, 95.7%, 97.8%, and 100%, respectively. Univariate Cox regression analysis revealed that stent diameter ≤7 mm (hazard ratio [HR]: 9.53; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.56-57.94, P = 0.014) and severe calcification (HR: 12.66; 95% CI 2.04-78.45, P = 0.006) were significantly associated with restenosis. Multivariate analysis showed severe calcification to be the only significant determinant of restenosis (HR: 12.66; 95% CI 2.04-78.45, P = 0.006).CONCLUSIONS:Kissing SECSs provide good midterm results for the treatment of aortoiliac occlusive disease. A stent diameter >7 mm is a potent protective factor against restenosis. Because severe calcification appears to be the only significant determinant of restenosis, patients with severe calcification require close follow-up.
Annals of vascular surgery 2023
BACKGROUND:Various endovascular treatment devices have been widely used in the lower extremity arterial disease (LEAD). Their patency efficiency for target lesions has been well studied and reported. Comparison of the risk of acute thrombosis events between the different endovascular treatment devices is unclear.AIMS:To rank the risk of acute thrombosis events when bare metal stents (BMSs), covered stents (CSs), drug-eluting stents (DESs), drug-coated balloons (DCBs), and conventional percutaneous transluminal balloon angioplasty (PTA) are used to treat LEAD through Bayesian network meta-analysis.METHODS:We performed a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing the risk of 1-year postoperative acute thrombosis between BMSs, CSs, DESs, DCBs, and PTA for treating LEAD. Bayesian random models were used for pooled endovascular treatment modality comparisons. We ranked these treatment modalities via the Bayesian method according to their surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) and estimated probabilities.RESULTS:Nineteen studies (38 study arms; 2758 patients) were included. The Bayesian network ranking of treatments indicated that DCB had the lowest risk of acute thrombosis, PTA had the second-lowest risk of thrombosis, and CS, BMS, and DES had the highest risk of thrombosis. Regarding the treatment efficacy, the OR values of the loss of primary patency were significantly lower for DCB (OR = 0.44, 95% CI: 0.30-0.62), DES (OR = 0.36, 95% CI: 0.14-0.94), and CS (OR = 0.31, 95% CI: 0.18,0.56) than for PTA. When BMS was used as a reference, only the OR for CS was significantly lower (OR = 0.41, 95% CI = 0.21-0.82). Correspondingly, the Bayesian ranking of treatments from better to worse target lesion primary patency was CS, DES, DCB, BMS, and PTA.CONCLUSION:With the available research evidence and according to the network analysis ranking, DES appears to have the highest risk of acute thrombosis and DCB appears to have the lowest risk.
Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions 2023
OBJECTIVE:Many centers consider postdilation if the final angiography after carotid artery stenting (CAS) shows residual stenosis of >30% to 40%. Postdilation has been demonstrated to potentially increase the risk of developing neurologic events. This study aimed to investigate the safety of CAS without postdilation regardless of the degree of residual stenosis.METHODS:We retrospectively investigated 191 patients who underwent transfemoral CAS without postdilation intendedly. All cases underwent mild predilation and self-expanding stent implantation. We divided the patients into a residual stenosis of ≥40% group (n = 69 [36.1%]) and a residual stenosis of <40% group (n = 122 [63.9%]) according to their final angiography. We compared the procedural (within 30 days after CAS) and nonprocedural (afterward) adverse cardiovascular events and in-stent restenosis between the two groups. We also investigated the incidence of perioperative hemodynamic depression between the groups and the changes in residual stenosis over the follow-up time.RESULTS:Patients in the residual stenosis of ≥40% group had a higher preoperative stenosis rate and a greater proportion of severely calcified lesions than those in the <40% group. There was one procedural cardiac death (0.5%), five strokes (2.6%), and four myocardial infarctions (2.1%). A total of 2.9% had stroke or death procedurally in the residual stenosis of ≥40% group and 3.2% in the residual stenosis of <40% group (P > .950). The median nonprocedural follow-up time was 22 months, with a total of six deaths and four strokes. The cumulative 2-year death or stroke rate was 6.2%, with 5.9% in the residual stenosis of ≥40% group versus 6.7% in the residual stenosis of <40% group (P = .507). There were two cases of in-stent restenosis in the residual stenosis of ≥40% group and three in the residual stenosis of <40% group (P = .927). The difference in the peak systolic velocity of the target lesion between groups at 3 months after CAS was no longer present, and residual stenosis stabilized at 10% to 20% at 6 months in both groups. The patients showed an association between increasing hemodynamic depression incidence and residual stenosis in a significantly graded response (P = .021).CONCLUSIONS:Residual stenosis after carotid stenting without postdilation is not associated with a risk of postoperative adverse events. This study provides evidence for the feasibility of a no postdilation strategy for CAS.
Journal of vascular surgery 2023
BACKGROUND:Although inflammation contributes to the development of acute kidney injury (AKI), the role of monocyte to lymphocyte ratio (MLR) in predicting the risk of postoperative AKI in patients underwent cardiac surgery is not completely clear yet. This study aimed to investigate whether elevated MLR predicts postoperative AKI.MATERIALS AND METHODS:In this retrospective study, a total of 331 adult patients who underwent heart valve replacement were included. These patients are not distinguished between single valve replacement or double valve replacement. AKI was diagnosed, according to the KDIGO classification criteria. The associations between monocyte to lymphocyte ratio (MLR), neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet to lymphocyte ratio (PLR) and the occurrence of AKI were investigated.RESULTS:Postoperative AKI was detected in 37 (11.2%) patients. In the early period after surgery, the patients who developed AKI had a significant higher preoperative MLR than those who did not (0.38(0.33-0.44) vs. 0.26(0.20-0.34), = 0.02). The receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve showed that the area under the curve (AUC) of the MLR for predicting AKI was 0.772 (P = 0.01), and the cut-off value was 0.47. Multivariate logistic regression analysis suggested that the higher preoperative MLR (≥0.47) was independent predictor of AKI (OR: 2.951, 95% CI: 1.412-6.167, P = 0.004). According to the cut-off value group verification, patients in the higher preoperative MLR group are more likely to have low cardiac output syndrome (LCOS), renal replacement therapy, and hospital death after surgery.CONCLUSION:These results showed that MLR could be used as a cost-effective predictor of postoperative AKI in patients who undergo heart valve replacement surgery.
The heart surgery forum 2022
