Administrative Model for Profiling Hospital Performance on Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery: Based on the Chinese Hospital Quality Monitoring System.

BACKGROUND:We aimed to develop an administrative model to profile the performance on the outcomes of coronary artery bypass grafting across hospitals in China.METHODS AND RESULTS:This retrospective study was based on the Chinese Hospital Quality Monitoring System (HQMS) from 2016 to 2020. The coronary artery bypass grafting cases were identified by procedure code, and those of 2016 to 2017 were randomly divided into modeling and validation cohorts, while those in other years were used to ensure the model stability across years. The outcome was discharge status as "death or withdrawal," and that withdrawal referred to discharge without medical advice when patients were in the terminal stage but reluctant to die in the hospital. Candidate covariates were mainly identified by diagnoses or procedures codes. Patient-level logistic models and hospital-level hierarchical models were established. A total of 203 010 coronary artery bypass grafts in 699 hospitals were included, with 60 704 and 20 233 cases in the modeling and validation cohorts and 40 423, 42 698, and 38 952 in the years 2018, 2019, and 2020, respectively. The death or withdrawal rate was 3.4%. The areas under the curve were 0.746 and 0.729 in the patient-level models of modeling and validation cohorts, respectively, with good calibration and stability across years. Hospital-specific risk-standardized death or withdrawal rates were 2.61% (interquartile range, 1.87%-3.99%) and 2.63% (interquartile range, 1.97%-3.44%) in the modeling and validation cohorts, which were highly correlated (correlation coefficient, 0.96; P<0.001). Between-hospital variations were distinguished among hospitals of different volumes and across years.CONCLUSIONS:The administrative model based on Hospital Quality Monitoring System could profile hospital performance on coronary artery bypass grafting in China.

Outcome differences between surgeons performing first and subsequent coronary artery bypass grafting procedures in a day: a retrospective comparative cohort study.

BACKGROUND:With increasing surgical workload, it is common for cardiac surgeons to perform coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) after other procedures in a workday. To investigate whether prior procedures performed by the surgeon impact the outcomes, we compared the outcomes between CABGs performed first versus those performed after prior procedures, separately for on-pump and off-pump CABGs as they differed in technical complexity.METHODS:We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients undergoing isolated CABG in China from January 2013 to December 2018. Patients were categorised as undergoing on-pump and off-pump CABGs. Outcomes of the procedures performed first in primary surgeons' daily schedule (first procedure) were compared with subsequent ones (non-first procedure). The primary outcome was an adverse events composite (AEC) defined as the number of adverse events, including in-hospital mortality, myocardial infarction, stroke, acute kidney injury and reoperation. Secondary outcomes were the individual components of the primary outcome, presented as binary variables. Mixed-effects models were used, adjusting for patient and surgeon-level characteristics and year of surgery.RESULTS:Among 21 866 patients, 10 109 (16.1% as non-first) underwent on-pump and 11 757 (29.6% as non-first) off-pump CABG. In the on-pump cohort, there was no significant association between procedure order and the outcomes (all p>0.05). In the off-pump cohort, non-first procedures were associated with an increased number of AEC (adjusted rate ratio 1.29, 95% CI 1.13 to 1.47, p<0.001), myocardial infarction (adjusted OR (ORadj) 1.43, 95% CI 1.13 to 1.81, p=0.003) and stroke (ORadj 1.73, 95% CI 1.18 to 2.53, p=0.005) compared with first procedures. These increases were only found to be statistically significant when the procedure was performed by surgeons with <20 years' practice or surgeons with a preindex volume <700 cases.CONCLUSIONS:For a technically challenging surgical procedure like off-pump CABG, prior workload adversely affected patient outcomes.

Potential of Quantitative Flow Ratio for Selecting Target Vessels for Radial Artery Grafting: A Retrospective Observational Study.

Outcomes After Isolated Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients with Bicuspid vs Tricuspid Aortic Valve.

To compare the outcomes in patients undergoing isolated aortic valve replacement with bicuspid (BAV) vs tricuspid aortic valves (TAV). A total of 1204 consecutive patients (BAV, n = 454; TAV, n = 750) underwent isolated aortic valve replacement (AVR) between 2002 and 2009 at a single institution. Adverse aortic events were defined as the occurrence of aortic dissection or the ascending aorta diameter greater than 50 mm or sudden death during follow-up. Propensity score matching yielded 318 patient pairs. Follow-up was obtained on 1156 patients. The mean length of follow up was 10.4 ± 3.9 years. A total of 155 (13.4%) patients died, and adverse aortic events occurred in 44 (3.8%) patients. After propensity score matching, the 12-year survivals was 85.5% in the BAV group and 89.2% in the TAV group; hazard ratio (HR) 1.6; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.0-2.5; P = 0.057. The 12-year cumulative incidence of late adverse aortic events was 14.6% in the BAV group and 10.8% in the TAV group; subdistribution hazard ratio (sHR) 1.1; 95% CI 0.6-2.0; P = 0.758. In the isolated aortic regurgitation subgroup, the rate of adverse aortic events was significantly higher in the BAV group than in the TAV group (sHR, 2.1; 95% CI, 1.1-4.0; P = 0.021). The long-term survival after isolated AVR was similar in both BAV and TAV patients. BAV does not increase the adverse aortic events after isolated AVR compared with the TAV.

Preoperative clopidogrel and outcomes in patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery.

OBJECTIVE:The optimal preoperative antiplatelet strategy for patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) requiring surgical revascularization remains unclear because of competing risks of bleeding and ischemic events. We evaluated the effect of clopidogrel within 5 days before coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) on outcomes in patients with ACS.METHODS:Consecutive patients with ACS who underwent isolated CABG at a single center were included in this retrospective study. The primary outcome was a composite of death, myocardial infarction, and stroke within 30 days after surgery. Secondary outcomes were CABG-related major bleeding and perioperative transfusion. Inverse probability weighting using propensity score was performed to evaluate the risk-adjusted effect of preoperative clopidogrel on outcomes.RESULTS:Of 5543 patients with ACS, 820 (14.8%) patients continued clopidogrel within 5 days before CABG. After adjustment for differences in baseline factors, clopidogrel use ≤5 days before CABG was associated with significantly increased odds of the primary composite outcome (odds ratio [OR], 1.63; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.16-2.29; P = .005), stroke (OR, 3.13; 95% CI, 1.82-5.39; P < .001), major bleeding (OR, 2.01; 95% CI, 1.56-2.58; P < .001), and transfusion (OR, 2.05; 95% CI, 1.82-2.30; P < .001). The effects of preoperative clopidogrel use ≤5 days on primary outcome and major bleeding were greater in patients older than 65 years.CONCLUSIONS:Among patients with ACS undergoing CABG, clopidogrel therapy within 5 days before surgery was associated with increased odds of major cardiac and cerebrovascular events and bleeding complications than discontinuing clopidogrel for >5 days.

Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting and Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With Chronic Total Occlusion and Multivessel Disease.

BACKGROUND:Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has been used increasingly as an alternative means of revascularization for patients with chronic total occlusion and multivessel disease. We investigated 5-year clinical outcomes following coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and PCI in patients with chronic total occlusion and multivessel disease.METHODS:In this single-center, retrospective cohort study, 4324 consecutive patients with ≥1 chronic total occlusion and multivessel disease were treated with either CABG (n=2264) or PCI (n=2060) between 2010 and 2013. The primary outcome was 5-year composite of death, myocardial infarction, or stroke. An inverse-probability-of-treatment weighting method was used adjusting for both patient and lesion characteristics.RESULTS:The unadjusted 5-year composite outcomes were similar between CABG group and PCI group (12.1% [258/2264] versus 11.4% [218/2060]; P=0.52). After adjustment for baseline variables, PCI was associated with significantly higher risk of composite outcomes (adjusted hazard ratio: 1.21 [95% CI, 1.02-1.44]; P=0.03). The inferiority of PCI in 5-year composite outcome was significant in patients with CABG recommendation according to SYNTAX (Synergy Between Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With Taxus and Cardiac Surgery) score II (adjusted hazard ratio: 1.55 [95% CI, 1.14-2.09]; P=0.005) but not evident in patients with PCI or PCI/CABG equipoise recommendation according to SYNTAX score II (adjusted hazard ratio: 0.94 [95% CI, 0.75-1.17]; P=0.56). A similar risk of 5-year composite outcomes was observed between CABG and PCI with residual SYNTAX score ≤8.CONCLUSIONS:In this single-center retrospective study among patients with chronic total occlusion and multivessel disease, PCI was associated with higher risk of 5-year composite death, myocardial infarction, or stroke.

Bi-atrial versus left atrial ablation for patients with rheumatic mitral valve disease and non-paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (ABLATION): rationale, design and study protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial.

INTRODUCTION:Atrial fibrillation (AF) is common in patients with rheumatic mitral valve disease (RMVD) and increase the risk of stroke and death. Bi-atrial or left atrial ablation remains controversial for treatment of AF during mitral valve surgery. The study aims to compare the efficacy and safety of bi-atrial ablation with those of left atrial ablation among patients with RMVD and persistent or long-standing persistent AF.METHODS AND ANALYSIS:The ABLATION trial (Bi-atrial vs Left Atrial Ablation for Patients with RMVD and Non-paroxysmal AF) is a prospective, multicentre, randomised controlled study. The trial will randomly assign 320 patients with RMVD and persistent or long-standing persistent AF to bi-atrial ablation procedure or left atrial ablation procedure in a 1:1 randomisation. The primary end point is freedom from documented AF, atrial flutter or atrial tachycardia of >30 s at 12 months after surgery off antiarrhythmic drugs. Key secondary end point is the probability of freedom from permanent pacemaker implantation at 12 months after surgery. Secondary outcomes include the probability of freedom from any recurrence of atrial tachyarrhythmias with antiarrhythmic drugs, AF burden, incidence of adverse events and cardiac function documented by echocardiography at 12 months after operation.ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION:The central ethics committee at Fuwai Hospital approved the ABLATION trial. The results of this study will be disseminated through publications in peer-reviewed journals and conference presentations.TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER:NCT05021601.

Clinical Outcomes in Chronic Total Occlusion Revascularization Versus No Chronic Total Occlusion Revascularization: Variability by Target Vessel.

We aimed to investigate the impact of target vessel on clinical outcomes in chronic total occlusion (CTO) revascularization versus no CTO revascularization. This multicenter, retrospective, cohort study involves patients with ≥1 CTO. After classification based on different CTO target vessels or multiple CTOs, patients were further categorized as the CTO revascularization group and the no CTO revascularization group based on treatment received. The primary outcome was a composite of death, myocardial infarction, stroke, repeated revascularization, and hospital admission due to ischemic symptoms. From August 2016 to August 2017, 1712 eligible patients were consecutively enrolled. Chronic total occlusion revascularization was associated with lower risk of 1-year major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCEs; adjusted hazard ratio [HR]: 0.36; 95% CI: 0.20-0.67; P = .001) compared with no CTO revascularization in left anterior descending (LAD) CTO patients. The benefit of CTO revascularization was not evident among those with left circumflex (LCX; adjusted HR: 0.51; 95% CI: 0.23-1.10; P = .087), right coronary artery (RCA; adjusted HR: 1.17; 95% CI: 0.59-2.33; P = .648), and multiple CTOs (adjusted HR: 1.00; 95% CI: 0.41-2.44; P = .994). Revascularization for LAD CTO, but not LCX, RCA, or multiple CTOs, was associated with lower risk of 1-year MACCEs compared with no CTO revascularization.

Trends of Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Performance in a Cohort of Hospitals in China Between 2013 and 2018.

BACKGROUND:China has witnessed a rapid increase in the volume of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) but substantial gaps in the performance for CABG across the nation. The present study aimed to investigate the change in CABG performance after years of quality improvement measures in a national registry in China.METHODS:The study included 66 971 patients who underwent isolated CABG in a cohort of 74 tertiary hospitals in China between January 2013 and December 2018. Data were collected from the Chinese Cardiac Surgery Registry. Outcomes were in-hospital mortality and postoperative length of stay. Five process measures for surgical technique and secondary prevention were also analyzed. We described the changes in the overall performance and interhospital heterogeneity across the years.RESULTS:The in-hospital mortality declined from 0.9% in 2013 to 0.6 in 2018, with a risk-adjusted odds ratio of 0.66 (95% CI, 0.46-0.93; P<0.001). The standard mean difference for risk-standardized mortality rate between hospitals in the lowest and highest quartile narrowed from 1.63 in 2013 to 1.35 in 2018. The median (interquartile range) hospital-level rate of using arterial graft increased from 93.9% (86.0%-97.8%) to 94.6% (83.3%-99.2%), but the difference was not statistically significant. Meanwhile, the rate of free from blood transfusion increased from 17.0% (2.6%-32.0%) to 34.1% (8.8%-52.9%). The hospital-level rate of prescribing β-blockers at discharge significantly increased from 82.8% (66.7%-90.3%) to 91.1% (82.1%-97.1%), statin from 75.8% (55.7%-88.9%) to 88.9% (75.0%-96.0%), and aspirin from 90.3% (83.9%-95.2%) to 95.3% (88.9%-98.1%).CONCLUSIONS:In the Chinese Cardiac Surgery Registry, there were notable improvements in the treatment process related to CABG and decline of in-hospital mortality with reduced interhospital heterogeneity.

Influence of operator volume on early outcomes of septal myectomy for isolated hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy.

BACKGROUND:Guidelines on the diagnosis and management of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) recommend that septal myectomy be performed by experienced operators. However, the impact of operator volume on surgical treatment outcomes for isolated HCM has been poorly investigated.METHODS:From 2002 to 2014, 435 consecutive patients with isolated HCM undergoing myectomy at the Fuwai Hospital were retrospectively enrolled. All 29 surgeons were divided into beginner surgeons (operator volume ≤20) and experienced surgeons (operator volume >20) according to the guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of HCM. Propensity score matching of patients in the two groups was performed.RESULTS:Baseline differences included advanced New York Heart Association classification and older age in the experienced surgeon group. After matching, in the beginner surgeon group (107 cases), residual obstruction (18.7% vs. 0.9%, P<0.001) was more common, and the postoperative left ventricular outflow tract pressure gradient (20.7±15.1 vs. 14.3±7.4 mmHg, P<0.001) was higher than that of the experienced surgeon group. In the experienced surgeon group (107 cases), the incidence of mitral valve replacement (1.9% vs. 11.2%, P<0.001) and permanent pacemaker implantation (1.9% vs. 3.7%, P<0.001) was significantly lower than that in the beginner surgeon group. However, there was no difference in procedural mortality (1.9% vs. 1.9%) between the two groups.CONCLUSIONS:Operator volume is an important factor in achieving better obstruction obliteration after septal myectomy in patients with isolated HCM.

Administrative Model for Profiling Hospital Performance on Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery: Based on the Chinese Hospital Quality Monitoring System.

BACKGROUND:We aimed to develop an administrative model to profile the performance on the outcomes of coronary artery bypass grafting across hospitals in China.METHODS AND RESULTS:This retrospective study was based on the Chinese Hospital Quality Monitoring System (HQMS) from 2016 to 2020. The coronary artery bypass grafting cases were identified by procedure code, and those of 2016 to 2017 were randomly divided into modeling and validation cohorts, while those in other years were used to ensure the model stability across years. The outcome was discharge status as "death or withdrawal," and that withdrawal referred to discharge without medical advice when patients were in the terminal stage but reluctant to die in the hospital. Candidate covariates were mainly identified by diagnoses or procedures codes. Patient-level logistic models and hospital-level hierarchical models were established. A total of 203 010 coronary artery bypass grafts in 699 hospitals were included, with 60 704 and 20 233 cases in the modeling and validation cohorts and 40 423, 42 698, and 38 952 in the years 2018, 2019, and 2020, respectively. The death or withdrawal rate was 3.4%. The areas under the curve were 0.746 and 0.729 in the patient-level models of modeling and validation cohorts, respectively, with good calibration and stability across years. Hospital-specific risk-standardized death or withdrawal rates were 2.61% (interquartile range, 1.87%-3.99%) and 2.63% (interquartile range, 1.97%-3.44%) in the modeling and validation cohorts, which were highly correlated (correlation coefficient, 0.96; P<0.001). Between-hospital variations were distinguished among hospitals of different volumes and across years.CONCLUSIONS:The administrative model based on Hospital Quality Monitoring System could profile hospital performance on coronary artery bypass grafting in China.

Outcome differences between surgeons performing first and subsequent coronary artery bypass grafting procedures in a day: a retrospective comparative cohort study.

BACKGROUND:With increasing surgical workload, it is common for cardiac surgeons to perform coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) after other procedures in a workday. To investigate whether prior procedures performed by the surgeon impact the outcomes, we compared the outcomes between CABGs performed first versus those performed after prior procedures, separately for on-pump and off-pump CABGs as they differed in technical complexity.METHODS:We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients undergoing isolated CABG in China from January 2013 to December 2018. Patients were categorised as undergoing on-pump and off-pump CABGs. Outcomes of the procedures performed first in primary surgeons' daily schedule (first procedure) were compared with subsequent ones (non-first procedure). The primary outcome was an adverse events composite (AEC) defined as the number of adverse events, including in-hospital mortality, myocardial infarction, stroke, acute kidney injury and reoperation. Secondary outcomes were the individual components of the primary outcome, presented as binary variables. Mixed-effects models were used, adjusting for patient and surgeon-level characteristics and year of surgery.RESULTS:Among 21 866 patients, 10 109 (16.1% as non-first) underwent on-pump and 11 757 (29.6% as non-first) off-pump CABG. In the on-pump cohort, there was no significant association between procedure order and the outcomes (all p>0.05). In the off-pump cohort, non-first procedures were associated with an increased number of AEC (adjusted rate ratio 1.29, 95% CI 1.13 to 1.47, p<0.001), myocardial infarction (adjusted OR (ORadj) 1.43, 95% CI 1.13 to 1.81, p=0.003) and stroke (ORadj 1.73, 95% CI 1.18 to 2.53, p=0.005) compared with first procedures. These increases were only found to be statistically significant when the procedure was performed by surgeons with <20 years' practice or surgeons with a preindex volume <700 cases.CONCLUSIONS:For a technically challenging surgical procedure like off-pump CABG, prior workload adversely affected patient outcomes.

Potential of Quantitative Flow Ratio for Selecting Target Vessels for Radial Artery Grafting: A Retrospective Observational Study.

Outcomes After Isolated Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients with Bicuspid vs Tricuspid Aortic Valve.

To compare the outcomes in patients undergoing isolated aortic valve replacement with bicuspid (BAV) vs tricuspid aortic valves (TAV). A total of 1204 consecutive patients (BAV, n = 454; TAV, n = 750) underwent isolated aortic valve replacement (AVR) between 2002 and 2009 at a single institution. Adverse aortic events were defined as the occurrence of aortic dissection or the ascending aorta diameter greater than 50 mm or sudden death during follow-up. Propensity score matching yielded 318 patient pairs. Follow-up was obtained on 1156 patients. The mean length of follow up was 10.4 ± 3.9 years. A total of 155 (13.4%) patients died, and adverse aortic events occurred in 44 (3.8%) patients. After propensity score matching, the 12-year survivals was 85.5% in the BAV group and 89.2% in the TAV group; hazard ratio (HR) 1.6; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.0-2.5; P = 0.057. The 12-year cumulative incidence of late adverse aortic events was 14.6% in the BAV group and 10.8% in the TAV group; subdistribution hazard ratio (sHR) 1.1; 95% CI 0.6-2.0; P = 0.758. In the isolated aortic regurgitation subgroup, the rate of adverse aortic events was significantly higher in the BAV group than in the TAV group (sHR, 2.1; 95% CI, 1.1-4.0; P = 0.021). The long-term survival after isolated AVR was similar in both BAV and TAV patients. BAV does not increase the adverse aortic events after isolated AVR compared with the TAV.

Preoperative clopidogrel and outcomes in patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery.

OBJECTIVE:The optimal preoperative antiplatelet strategy for patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) requiring surgical revascularization remains unclear because of competing risks of bleeding and ischemic events. We evaluated the effect of clopidogrel within 5 days before coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) on outcomes in patients with ACS.METHODS:Consecutive patients with ACS who underwent isolated CABG at a single center were included in this retrospective study. The primary outcome was a composite of death, myocardial infarction, and stroke within 30 days after surgery. Secondary outcomes were CABG-related major bleeding and perioperative transfusion. Inverse probability weighting using propensity score was performed to evaluate the risk-adjusted effect of preoperative clopidogrel on outcomes.RESULTS:Of 5543 patients with ACS, 820 (14.8%) patients continued clopidogrel within 5 days before CABG. After adjustment for differences in baseline factors, clopidogrel use ≤5 days before CABG was associated with significantly increased odds of the primary composite outcome (odds ratio [OR], 1.63; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.16-2.29; P = .005), stroke (OR, 3.13; 95% CI, 1.82-5.39; P < .001), major bleeding (OR, 2.01; 95% CI, 1.56-2.58; P < .001), and transfusion (OR, 2.05; 95% CI, 1.82-2.30; P < .001). The effects of preoperative clopidogrel use ≤5 days on primary outcome and major bleeding were greater in patients older than 65 years.CONCLUSIONS:Among patients with ACS undergoing CABG, clopidogrel therapy within 5 days before surgery was associated with increased odds of major cardiac and cerebrovascular events and bleeding complications than discontinuing clopidogrel for >5 days.

Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting and Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With Chronic Total Occlusion and Multivessel Disease.

BACKGROUND:Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has been used increasingly as an alternative means of revascularization for patients with chronic total occlusion and multivessel disease. We investigated 5-year clinical outcomes following coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and PCI in patients with chronic total occlusion and multivessel disease.METHODS:In this single-center, retrospective cohort study, 4324 consecutive patients with ≥1 chronic total occlusion and multivessel disease were treated with either CABG (n=2264) or PCI (n=2060) between 2010 and 2013. The primary outcome was 5-year composite of death, myocardial infarction, or stroke. An inverse-probability-of-treatment weighting method was used adjusting for both patient and lesion characteristics.RESULTS:The unadjusted 5-year composite outcomes were similar between CABG group and PCI group (12.1% [258/2264] versus 11.4% [218/2060]; P=0.52). After adjustment for baseline variables, PCI was associated with significantly higher risk of composite outcomes (adjusted hazard ratio: 1.21 [95% CI, 1.02-1.44]; P=0.03). The inferiority of PCI in 5-year composite outcome was significant in patients with CABG recommendation according to SYNTAX (Synergy Between Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With Taxus and Cardiac Surgery) score II (adjusted hazard ratio: 1.55 [95% CI, 1.14-2.09]; P=0.005) but not evident in patients with PCI or PCI/CABG equipoise recommendation according to SYNTAX score II (adjusted hazard ratio: 0.94 [95% CI, 0.75-1.17]; P=0.56). A similar risk of 5-year composite outcomes was observed between CABG and PCI with residual SYNTAX score ≤8.CONCLUSIONS:In this single-center retrospective study among patients with chronic total occlusion and multivessel disease, PCI was associated with higher risk of 5-year composite death, myocardial infarction, or stroke.

Bi-atrial versus left atrial ablation for patients with rheumatic mitral valve disease and non-paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (ABLATION): rationale, design and study protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial.

INTRODUCTION:Atrial fibrillation (AF) is common in patients with rheumatic mitral valve disease (RMVD) and increase the risk of stroke and death. Bi-atrial or left atrial ablation remains controversial for treatment of AF during mitral valve surgery. The study aims to compare the efficacy and safety of bi-atrial ablation with those of left atrial ablation among patients with RMVD and persistent or long-standing persistent AF.METHODS AND ANALYSIS:The ABLATION trial (Bi-atrial vs Left Atrial Ablation for Patients with RMVD and Non-paroxysmal AF) is a prospective, multicentre, randomised controlled study. The trial will randomly assign 320 patients with RMVD and persistent or long-standing persistent AF to bi-atrial ablation procedure or left atrial ablation procedure in a 1:1 randomisation. The primary end point is freedom from documented AF, atrial flutter or atrial tachycardia of >30 s at 12 months after surgery off antiarrhythmic drugs. Key secondary end point is the probability of freedom from permanent pacemaker implantation at 12 months after surgery. Secondary outcomes include the probability of freedom from any recurrence of atrial tachyarrhythmias with antiarrhythmic drugs, AF burden, incidence of adverse events and cardiac function documented by echocardiography at 12 months after operation.ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION:The central ethics committee at Fuwai Hospital approved the ABLATION trial. The results of this study will be disseminated through publications in peer-reviewed journals and conference presentations.TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER:NCT05021601.

Clinical Outcomes in Chronic Total Occlusion Revascularization Versus No Chronic Total Occlusion Revascularization: Variability by Target Vessel.

We aimed to investigate the impact of target vessel on clinical outcomes in chronic total occlusion (CTO) revascularization versus no CTO revascularization. This multicenter, retrospective, cohort study involves patients with ≥1 CTO. After classification based on different CTO target vessels or multiple CTOs, patients were further categorized as the CTO revascularization group and the no CTO revascularization group based on treatment received. The primary outcome was a composite of death, myocardial infarction, stroke, repeated revascularization, and hospital admission due to ischemic symptoms. From August 2016 to August 2017, 1712 eligible patients were consecutively enrolled. Chronic total occlusion revascularization was associated with lower risk of 1-year major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCEs; adjusted hazard ratio [HR]: 0.36; 95% CI: 0.20-0.67; P = .001) compared with no CTO revascularization in left anterior descending (LAD) CTO patients. The benefit of CTO revascularization was not evident among those with left circumflex (LCX; adjusted HR: 0.51; 95% CI: 0.23-1.10; P = .087), right coronary artery (RCA; adjusted HR: 1.17; 95% CI: 0.59-2.33; P = .648), and multiple CTOs (adjusted HR: 1.00; 95% CI: 0.41-2.44; P = .994). Revascularization for LAD CTO, but not LCX, RCA, or multiple CTOs, was associated with lower risk of 1-year MACCEs compared with no CTO revascularization.

Trends of Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Performance in a Cohort of Hospitals in China Between 2013 and 2018.

BACKGROUND:China has witnessed a rapid increase in the volume of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) but substantial gaps in the performance for CABG across the nation. The present study aimed to investigate the change in CABG performance after years of quality improvement measures in a national registry in China.METHODS:The study included 66 971 patients who underwent isolated CABG in a cohort of 74 tertiary hospitals in China between January 2013 and December 2018. Data were collected from the Chinese Cardiac Surgery Registry. Outcomes were in-hospital mortality and postoperative length of stay. Five process measures for surgical technique and secondary prevention were also analyzed. We described the changes in the overall performance and interhospital heterogeneity across the years.RESULTS:The in-hospital mortality declined from 0.9% in 2013 to 0.6 in 2018, with a risk-adjusted odds ratio of 0.66 (95% CI, 0.46-0.93; P<0.001). The standard mean difference for risk-standardized mortality rate between hospitals in the lowest and highest quartile narrowed from 1.63 in 2013 to 1.35 in 2018. The median (interquartile range) hospital-level rate of using arterial graft increased from 93.9% (86.0%-97.8%) to 94.6% (83.3%-99.2%), but the difference was not statistically significant. Meanwhile, the rate of free from blood transfusion increased from 17.0% (2.6%-32.0%) to 34.1% (8.8%-52.9%). The hospital-level rate of prescribing β-blockers at discharge significantly increased from 82.8% (66.7%-90.3%) to 91.1% (82.1%-97.1%), statin from 75.8% (55.7%-88.9%) to 88.9% (75.0%-96.0%), and aspirin from 90.3% (83.9%-95.2%) to 95.3% (88.9%-98.1%).CONCLUSIONS:In the Chinese Cardiac Surgery Registry, there were notable improvements in the treatment process related to CABG and decline of in-hospital mortality with reduced interhospital heterogeneity.

Influence of operator volume on early outcomes of septal myectomy for isolated hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy.

BACKGROUND:Guidelines on the diagnosis and management of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) recommend that septal myectomy be performed by experienced operators. However, the impact of operator volume on surgical treatment outcomes for isolated HCM has been poorly investigated.METHODS:From 2002 to 2014, 435 consecutive patients with isolated HCM undergoing myectomy at the Fuwai Hospital were retrospectively enrolled. All 29 surgeons were divided into beginner surgeons (operator volume ≤20) and experienced surgeons (operator volume >20) according to the guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of HCM. Propensity score matching of patients in the two groups was performed.RESULTS:Baseline differences included advanced New York Heart Association classification and older age in the experienced surgeon group. After matching, in the beginner surgeon group (107 cases), residual obstruction (18.7% vs. 0.9%, P<0.001) was more common, and the postoperative left ventricular outflow tract pressure gradient (20.7±15.1 vs. 14.3±7.4 mmHg, P<0.001) was higher than that of the experienced surgeon group. In the experienced surgeon group (107 cases), the incidence of mitral valve replacement (1.9% vs. 11.2%, P<0.001) and permanent pacemaker implantation (1.9% vs. 3.7%, P<0.001) was significantly lower than that in the beginner surgeon group. However, there was no difference in procedural mortality (1.9% vs. 1.9%) between the two groups.CONCLUSIONS:Operator volume is an important factor in achieving better obstruction obliteration after septal myectomy in patients with isolated HCM.