刘可
云南省阜外心血管病医院 心律失常中心
BACKGROUND:Dual-phase cardiac computed tomography (CCT) has been applied to detect left atrial appendage (LAA) thrombosis, which is characterized as the presence of left atrial appendage filling defects (LAADF) in both early- and delayed-phase scanning. However, the clinical implication of LAAFD in exclusive early-phase scanning (LAAFD-EEpS) of CCT in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) is unclear.METHODS:The baseline clinical data and dual-phase CCT findings in 1183 AF patients (62.1 ± 11.6 years, 59.9% male) was collected and analyzed. A further analysis of CCT and transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) data (within 5 days) in a subgroup of 687 patients was performed. LAAFD-EEpS was defined as LAAFD present in early-phase and absent in delayed-phase scanning of dual-phase CCT.RESULTS:A total of 133 (11.2%) patients were detected with LAAFD-EEpS. Patients with LAAFD-EEpS had a higher prevalence of ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) (p < 0.001) and a higher predefined thromboembolic risk (p < 0.001). In multivariate analysis, a history of ischemic stroke or TIA was independently associated with LAAFD-EEpS (odds ratio [OR] 11.412, 95% confidence interval [CI] 6.561-19.851, p < 0.001). When spontaneous echo contrast in TEE was used as the reference standard, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of LAAFD-EEpS was 77.0% (95% CI 66.5-87.6%), 89.0% (95% CI 86.5-91.4%), 40.5% (95% CI 31.6-49.5%), 97.5% (96.3-98.8%), respectively.CONCLUSIONS:In AF patients, LAAFD-EEpS is not an uncommon finding in dual-phase CCT scanning, and is associated with elevated thromboembolic risk.
Cardiology journal 2024
INTRODUCTION:Optimal occlusion of pulmonary vein (PV) is essential for atrial fibrillation (AF) cryoballoon ablation (CBA). The aim of the study was to investigate the performance of two different tools for the assessment of PV occlusion with a novel navigation system in CBA procedure.METHODS:In consecutive patients with paroxysmal AF who underwent CBA procedure with the guidance of the novel 3-dimentional mapping system, the baseline tool, injection tool and pulmonary venography were all employed to assess the degree of PV occlusion, and the corresponding cryoablation parameters were recorded.RESULTS:In 23 patients (mean age 60.0 ± 13.9 years, 56.5% male), a total of 149 attempts of occlusion and 122 cryoablations in 92 PVs were performed. Using pulmonary venography as the gold standard, the overall sensitivity, specificity of the baseline tool was 96.7% (95% confidence interval [CI] 90.0%-99.1%), and 40.5% (95% CI 26.0%-56.7%), respectively, while the corresponding value of the injection tool was 69.6% (95% CI 59.7%-78.1%), and 100.0% (95% CI 90.6%-100.0%), respectively. Cryoablation with optimal occlusion showed lower nadir temperature (baseline tool: -44.3 ± 8.4°C vs. -35.1 ± 6.5°C, p < .001; injection tool: -46.7 ± 6.4°C vs. -38.3 ± 9.2°C, p < .001) and longer total thaw time (baseline tool: 53.3 ± 17.0 s vs. 38.2 ± 14.9 s, p = .003; injection tool: 58.5 ± 15.5 s vs. 41.7 ± 15.2 s, p < .001) compared with those without.CONCLUSIONS:Both tools were able to accurately assess the degree of PV occlusion and predict the acute cryoablation effect, with the baseline tool being more sensitive and the injection tool more specific.
Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology 2023
BACKGROUND:The present study aimed to investigate the prevalence, predictors, and management of left atrial appendage (LAA) thrombogenic milieu (TM) identified with transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) in non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) patients with low to moderate thromboembolic (TE) risk.METHODS:We retrospectively analyzed the baseline clinical data and TEE findings in 391 NVAF patients (54.7 ± 8.9 years, 69.1% male) with low to moderate TE risk according to the CHA2DS2-VASc score. LAA TM was defined as LAA thrombus (LAAT), sludge or spontaneous echo contrast (SEC). Management of LAA TM was at the discretion of the treating physician.RESULTS:A total of 43 patients (11.0%) were detected with LAA TM, including 5 with LAAT (11.6%), 4 with LAAT + Sect. (9.3%), 3 with sludge (7.0%), and 31 with Sect. (72.1%). In multivariate model, non-paroxysmal AF (OR 3.121; 95% CI 1.205-8.083, p = 0.019), and a larger left atrial diameter (LAD) (OR 1.134; 95% CI 1.060-1.213, p < 0.001) were significantly associated with the presence of LAA TM. All LAATs or sludges effectively resolved after mean duration of 117.5 ± 20.0 days for oral anticoagulant (OAC) medication. TE events occurred in 3 patients (18.8%) among those discontinuing OAC over a mean follow-up of 26.2 ± 8.8 months, while no TE events occurred in patients with continuous OAC.CONCLUSIONS:LAA TM could be identified in 11.0% in NVAF patients with low to moderate TE risk, especially in those with non-paroxysmal AF and enlarged LAD. Short-term OAC medication could effectively resolve the LAAT or sludge.
Thrombosis journal 2023
Background:The long-term outcomes of ablation index (AI)-guided radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) on atrial fibrillation (AF) and different subtypes of heart failure (HF) remain unknown. The aim of the study was to evaluate the long-term prognosis of AI-guided RFCA procedures in patients with AF and concomitant HF.Methods:We retrospectively included consecutive patients with AF and HF who underwent the initial RFCA procedure with AI guidance from March 2018 to June 2021 in our institution. The patients were categorized into two groups: HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) group and HF with mid-range ejection fraction (HFmrEF) +HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) group.Results:A total of 101 patients were included. HFpEF and HFmrEF + HFrEF groups consisted of 71 (70.3%) and 30 patients (29.7%), respectively. During a median follow-up of 32.0 (18.2, 37.6) months, no significant difference was detected in AF recurrence between groups (21.1 vs. 33.3%) after multiple procedures, whereas the incidence of the composite endpoint of all-cause death, thromboembolic events, and HF hospitalization was significantly lower in HFpEF group (9.9 vs. 25.0%, Log-rank p = 0.018). In multivariable analysis, a history of hypertension [hazard ratio (HR) 4.667, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.433-15.203, p = 0.011], left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) < 50% (HR 5.390, 95% CI 1.911-15.203, p = 0.001) and recurrent AF after multiple procedures (HR 7.542, 95% CI 2.355-24.148, p = 0.001) were independently associated with the incidence of the composite endpoint.Conclusion:Long-term success could be achieved in 75% of patients with AF and concomitant HF after AI-guided RFCA procedures, irrespective of different HF subtypes. Preserved LVEF was associated with a reduction in the composite endpoint compared with impaired LVEF. Patients with recurrent AF tend to have a poorer prognosis.
Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine 2022
AIMS:An improved left ventricular ejection fraction (HFiEF) was observed across heart failure (HF) patients with a reduced or mid-range ejection fraction (HFrEF or HFmrEF, respectively). We postulated that HFiEF patients are clinically distinct from non-HFiEF patients.METHODS AND RESULTS:A total of 447 patients hospitalized due to a clinical diagnosis of HF (LVEF <50% at baseline) were enrolled from September 2017 to September 2019. Echocardiogram re-evaluation was conducted repeatedly over 6 months of follow-up after discharge. The primary endpoint included the composite of HF hospitalization and all-cause mortality. Subjects (n = 184) with HFiEF (defined as an absolute LVEF improvement≥10%) were compared with 263 non-HFiEF (defined by <10% improvement in LVEF) subjects. Multivariable Cox regression was performed and identified younger age, smaller left ventricular end diastolic dimension (LVEDD), beta-blocker use, AF ablation and cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) as independent predictors of HFiEF. According to Kaplan-Meier analysis, HFiEF subjects had lower cardiac composite outcomes (P = 0.002) and all-cause mortality (P = 0.003) than non-HFiEF subjects. Multivariate Cox survival analysis revealed that non-HFiEF (compared with HFiEF) was an independent predictor of both the primary endpoints (HR = 0.679, 95% CI: 0.451-0.907, P = 0.012), which was driven by all-cause mortality (HR = 0.504, 95% CI: 0.256-0.991, P = 0.047).CONCLUSIONS:These data confirm that compared with non-HFiEF, HFiEF is a distinct HF phenotype with favourable clinical outcomes.
ESC heart failure 2021
