南祎峰
中国医学科学院阜外医院 心血管外科
BACKGROUND:Applying technology through the use of the Internet and mobile phones can help provide education and trained peer support for patients with diabetes after coronary artery bypass (CABG). We are conducting a randomized controlled trial to evaluate the efficacy and feasibility of mobile-based coaching intervention in improving risk-factor control and secondary prevention in patients with diabetes after CABG.METHODS:The glycaemic control using miniprogram-based intervention in patients with diabetes undergoing coronary artery bypass to promote self-management (GUIDE ME) study is a multi-centre, randomized controlled trial of mobile intervention versus standard treatment with 6 months follow-up conducted in 2 hospitals in China. The interventions are education and a reminder system based on the WeChat mini-program. Participants in the intervention groups receive 180 videos (including lines) about secondary prevention education for 6 months as well as the standard treatment. Behavioural change techniques, such as prompting barrier identification, motivational skills, and goal setting, are employed. A total sample size of 820 patients would be adequate for the GUIDE ME study. The primary outcome is the change of glycaemic haemoglobin (HbA1c) at 6 months. Secondary outcomes include a change in the proportions of patients achieving HbA1c, fasting blood glucose, systolic blood pressure, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and medication adherence.DISCUSSION:This trial is the first to investigate the efficacy of mobile phone WeChat-based video coaching and medication reminder mini-program system to improve self-management in patients with diabetes and coronary heart disease (CHD) after CABG and has the potential to be applied in resource-limited settings across diverse populations. If successful, such mobile intervention could be used and scaled up to improve care for this high-risk group of patients.TRIAL REGISTRATION:ClinicalTrials, NCT04192409 . Registered on December 10, 2019.
Trials 2023
BACKGROUND:Functional mitral regurgitation (FMR) worsens the prognosis of patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). While concomitant mitral valve surgery (MVS) is recommended for severe FMR during aortic valve replacement (AVR), the optimal treatment of moderate FMR, especially in those with HFpEF, remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of MVS in patients with moderate FMR and HFpEF undergoing AVR.METHODS:A total of 212 consecutive patients (AVR: 34.0%, AVR-MVS: 66.0%) during 2010 and 2019 were enrolled. Survival outcomes were compared. Inverse probability treatment weighting (IPTW) was used to balance the baseline characteristics. Kaplan-Meier curve and log-rank test were applied to compare the survival outcomes. The primary endpoint was the overall mortality.RESULTS:The mean age was 58.9 [Formula: see text] 11.9 years, and 27.8% of them were female. During a median follow-up of 16.4 months, AVR-MVS did not reduce the risk of mid-term MACCE (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.53, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.57-4.17, Plog-rank = 0.396), while it showed a tendency toward higher MACCE risk in the IPTW analysis (HR: 2.62, 95% CI: 0.84-8.16, Plog-rank = 0.096). In addition, AVR-MVS increased the risk of mortality as compared to isolated AVR (0 vs. 10%, Plog-rank = 0.016), which was sustained in the IPTW analysis (0 vs. 9.9%, Plog-rank<0.001).CONCLUSION:In patients with moderate FMR and HFpEF, isolated AVR might be more reasonable than AVR-MVS.
Journal of cardiothoracic surgery 2023
BACKGROUND:Carbohydrate antigen 125 (CA125) is a biomarker often used in diagnosis of ovarian tumors. Studies also show that elevated CA125 implicates worse outcomes among patients with heart failure, while latter of which plays an important role in the pathophysiology of left ventricular aneurysm (LVA). However, the prognostic value of CA125 in LVA patients undergoing surgical left ventricular reconstruction (SLVR) remains unclear.METHODS:In this single-centered cohort study, a total of 309 patients with LVA undergoing SLVR were retrospectively recruited. Univariable regression analysis was performed to identify the potential confounders for each outcome, followed by multivariable adjustment to confirm the association between CA125 and outcomes. The primary outcome was the overall mortality, and the secondary outcome was the major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) and perioperative outcomes. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was use to find the optimal cut-off value of CA125.RESULTS:The median follow-up time was 55 months. The cohort was predominantly male (86.4%), with an average age of 58.6 years. Log (CA125) was associated with overall mortality (hazard ratio [HR]: 2.15, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.06-4.36, P = 0.033), prolonged hospital-stay time (HR:1.07, 95%CI: 1.03-1.12, P = 0.001) and increased risk of postoperative ventricular support (HR: 2.81, 95%CI: 1.10-7.18, P = 0.031) after multivariate adjustment. The optimal cut-off value for the CA125 for all-cause mortality was 13.825 U/ml with the area under curve of 0.675.CONCLUSION:Elevated-CA125 implicates poorer short- and long-term prognosis in LVA patients undergoing SLVR.
International journal of cardiology 2023
Background:Controversies exist on the treatment of moderate functional mitral regurgitation (FMR) in patients with severe aortic valve disease undergoing the aortic valve replacement (AVR). While a substantial proportion of these patients can be complicated with heart failure with midrange ejection fraction (HFmrEF), established studies show that the latter might compromise the patient outcome. This study was aimed to evaluate the prognostic value of concomitant mitral valve surgery during AVR in patients with severe aortic valve disease followed by moderate FMR and HFmrEF.Methods:A total of 78 consecutive patients were retrospectively recruited. Patients were divided into control (isolated AVR) and treatment (AVR + mitral valve surgery) groups. Follow-up outcomes were compared by Kaplan-Meier method, followed by multiple adjustment with inverse probability treatment weighting (IPTW) analysis. The primary outcome was the occurrence of major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE).Results:Thirty-six patients received isolated AVR, while 42 received AVR with mitral valve repair or replacement. The median follow-up time was 28.7 months. Unadjusted analysis showed that there was no significant difference in the rate of MACCE between the two groups [hazard ratio (HR): 1.14, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.48-2.69, Plogrank=0.770], which was sustained in IPTW analysis (HR: 1.64, 95% CI: 0.59-4.55, Plogrank=0.342). In addition, while concomitant mitral valve surgery improved follow-up FMR more completely (P=0.026) in the IPTW analysis, the ejection fraction was comparable between the two groups (P=0.276). Furthermore, IPTW analysis also showed that mitral valve surgery was associated with the increased risk of postoperative acute kidney injury (P=0.007).Conclusions:In patients with aortic valve disease followed by moderate FMR and HFmrEF, mitral valve surgery concomitant to AVR may not bring extra benefit in the MACCE-free survival and the improvement of HFmrEF. However, while concomitant mitral valve surgery has priority on the complete improvement of FMR, it might increase the risk of postoperative acute kidney injury.
Journal of thoracic disease 2022
AIMS:The optimal treatment for severe aortic valve disease complicated with moderate function mitral regurgitation (FMR) remains controversial. Although isolated surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) is reasonable, previous studies also show that moderate FMR might deteriorate after surgical treatment and result in poorer prognosis. Because the left ventricular remodelling plays a critical role in the development of FMR, these patients might potentially benefit from the administration of β-blocker (BB). Unfortunately, relevant clinical evidence is lacking. This study aimed to investigate the impact of post-operative administration of BB on the outcomes of moderate FMR patients undergoing isolated SAVR.METHODS:In this single-centre cohort study, patients who underwent isolated SAVR and complicated with pre-operative moderate FMR during 2010 and 2019 at our centre were retrospectively recruited. Patients were divided into two groups according to postoperative administration of BB (BB group vs. control group). The cumulative survival rates were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method and tested by the log-rank test, followed by inverse probability treatment weighting (IPTW) analysis to further control the between-group imbalances. The primary outcome was the major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE), a composite endpoint of all-cause death, repeat heart valve surgery, non-fatal myocardial infarction, stroke, and hospitalization for heart failure.RESULTS:A total of 165 patients were enrolled, 57 (34.6%) of whom were female, and the mean age was 59.2 ± 12.2 years. Eighty (48.5%) patients received post-operative BB therapy. The median follow-up time was 18.4 months. The administration of BB was not associated with lower risk of MACCE [hazard ratio (HR): 0.68, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.29-1.62, P = 0.388] or all-cause death (HR: 1.03, 95% CI: 0.30-0.56, P = 0.967). In the IPTW dataset, the total number of patients were 326.89, and the outcomes regarding the risk of MACCE (HR: 0.79, 95% CI: 0.31-1.97, P = 0.607) and all-cause death (HR: 1.33, 95% CI:0.35-5.05, P = 0.674) were in line with the unmatched analysis. The follow-up echocardiographic results were available for 72.2% of the overall cohort, and the use of BB was observed to be associated with higher improvement rate of follow-up FMR according to the IPTW analysis (92.2% vs. 98.3%, P = 0.033).CONCLUSIONS:The administration of BB after SAVR was not associated with lower risk of MACCE for patients of severe aortic valve disease complicated with moderate FMR, but was potentially beneficial for improving FMR.
ESC heart failure 2022
OBJECTIVES:The aim of this study was to evaluate the mid-term outcome of coronary endarterectomy (CE) combined with coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and explore the potential risk factors for adverse events.METHODS:A total of 208 consecutive patients underwent CE between 2008 and 2018 in our centre, of which 198 were included in this retrospective cohort study. The primary end point was major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCEs). Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed to evaluate event-free survival, whereas subgroup analysis and Cox regression were used to explore risk factors for the outcomes.RESULTS:The median follow-up time was 34.7 months. CE + CABG was performed mainly on the left anterior descending artery (42.3%) or right coronary artery (42.3%). Both operative mortality and incidence of perioperative myocardial infarction were 1.5%. The overall survival at 3 and 5 years was 98.0% and 95.9%, whereas the MACCE-free survival was 93.7% and 89.4%, respectively. No significant difference in the incidence of MACCE was observed between on-pump and off-pump CE (P = 0.256) or between left anterior descending artery and non-left anterior descending artery endarterectomy (P = 0.540). Advanced age (>65 years) was associated with a higher risk of MACCE both in univariate [hazard ratio (HR) 3.62, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.37-9.62; P = 0.010] and multivariate analysis (HR 3.59, 95% CI 1.32-9.77; P = 0.013).CONCLUSIONS:When performed by experienced surgeons, CE + CABG could be an acceptable approach to achieve complete revascularization of diffusely diseased coronary arteries with satisfactory outcomes, although advanced age might increase the risk of MACCE.
Interactive cardiovascular and thoracic surgery 2021
