陈冬
火箭军特色医学中心 胃食管反流病科
PURPOSE:This study aimed to evaluate the association between the outflow morphology and abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) rupture risk, to find risk factors for future prediction models.MATERIALS AND METHODS:We retrospectively analyzed 46 patients with ruptured AAAs and 46 patients with stable AAAs using a 1:1 match for sex, age, and maximum aneurysm diameter. The chi-square test, paired t-test, and Wilcoxon signed-rank test were used to compare variables. Logistic regression was performed to evaluate variables potentially associated with AAA rupture. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis and the area under the curve (AUC) were used to assess the regression models.RESULTS:Ruptured AAAs had a shorter proximal aortic neck (median (interquartile range, IQR): 24.0 (9.4-34.2) mm vs. 33.3 (20.0-52.8) mm, p = 0.004), higher tortuosity (median(IQR): 1.35 (1.23-1.49) vs. 1.29 (1.23-1.39), p = 0.036), and smaller minimum luminal area of the right common iliac artery (CIA) (median (IQR): 86.7 (69.9-126.4) mm2 vs. 118.9 (86.3-164.1)mm2, p = 0.001) and left CIA (median(IQR): 92.2 (67.3,125.1) mm2 vs. 110.7 (80.12, 161.1) mm2, p = 0.010) than stable AAA did. Multiple regression analysis demonstrated significant associations of the minimum luminal area of the bilateral CIAs (odds ratio [OR] = 0.996, 95 % confidence interval [CI] 0.991-0.999, p = 0.037), neck length (OR = 0.969, 95 % CI 0.941-0.993, p = 0.017), and aneurysm tortuosity (OR = 1.031, 95 % CI 1.003-1.063, p = 0.038) with ruptured AAAs. The AUC of this regression model was 0.762 (95 % CI 0.664-0.860, p < 0.001).CONCLUSIONS:The smaller minimum luminal area of the CIA is associated with an increased risk of rupture. This study highlights the potential of utilizing outflow parameters as novel and additional tools in risk assessment. It also provides a compelling rationale to further intensify research in this area.
European journal of radiology 2024
BACKGROUND:To compare the 30-day and long-term outcomes between patients with concomitant type B intramural hematoma and intimal disruption upon admission who underwent endovascular repair in the acute or subacute phases.METHODS:Data were extracted from January 1, 2010, to December 31, 2019. Logistic regression and Cox regression were performed to evaluate the impact of timing of intervention on 30-day and long-term outcomes, respectively.RESULTS:The study included 241 patients, among which 159 were in the acute group. No significant difference was observed in 30-day mortality (0.6% vs. 0%, P = 1), 30-day complication rate (2.5% vs. 1.2%, P = 0.664), long-term all-cause mortality (10.7% vs. 7.3%, P = 0.540), and aortic reintervention rate (2.5% vs. 2.4%, P = 1) between the acute and subacute group. In multivariable analysis, the timing of intervention was not associated with 30-day mortality (odds ratio (OR) = 0, 95% confidence interval CI: 0-Inf, P = 0.999), 30-day complication (OR = 0.30, 95% CI: 0.02-3.77, P = 0.348), long-term mortality (hazard ratio = 0.56, 95% CI: 0.20-1.61, P = 0.283), and aortic reintervention (OR = 0.97, 95% CI: 0.15-6.08, P = 0.970).CONCLUSIONS:For patients with concomitant type B intramural hematoma and intimal disruption upon admission, there is no significant difference in 30-day and long-term outcomes between those who undergo endovascular treatment in the acute or subacute phase.
Annals of vascular surgery 2023
BACKGROUND:Aortic pseudoaneurysm is a life-threatening clinical condition, and thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) has been reported to have a relatively satisfactory effect in aortic pathologies. We summarized our single-centre experience using chimney TEVAR for aortic arch pseudoaneurysms with inadequate landing zones.METHODS:A retrospective study was conducted from October 2015 to August 2020, 32 patients with aortic arch pseudoaneurysms underwent chimney TEVAR to exclude an aortic lesion and reconstruct the supra-aortic branches, including 3 innominate artery, 12 left common carotid arteries and 29 left subclavian arteries. Follow-up computed tomography was suggested before discharge; at 3, 6, 12 months and yearly thereafter.RESULTS:The median age of 32 patients was 68.0 years (range, 28-81) with the mean max diameter of aneurysm of 47.9 ± 12.0 mm. Forty-four related supra-aortic branches were well preserved, and the technical success rate was 100%. The Type Ia endoleaks occurred in 3 (9%) patients. Two patients were lost to follow-up and 4 patients died during the follow-up period. The mean follow-up times was 46.5 ± 14.3 months. One patient died due to acute myocardial infarction just 10 days after chimney TEVAR and the other 3 patients passed away at 1.5 months, 20 months, and 31 months with non-aortic reasons. The 4.5-year survival estimate was 84.4%. The primary patency rate of the target supra-arch branch vessels was 97.7% (43/44), and no other aorta-related reinterventions and severe complications occurred.CONCLUSION:For aortic arch pseudoaneurysms with inadequate landing zones for TEVAR, the chimney technique seems to be feasible, with acceptable mid-term outcomes, and it could serve as an alternative minimally invasive approach to extend the landing zone. Slow flow type Ia endoleak could be treated conservatively after chimney TEVAR. Additional experience is needed, and the long-term durability of chimney TEVAR requires further follow-up.
BMC cardiovascular disorders 2023
RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES:An anatomic association between ductus diverticulum and the primary entry tear in type B aortic dissection was observed. The aim was to reveal the association between ductus diverticulum and acute type B aortic dissection.MATERIALS AND METHODS:A matched case-control study was conducted. Case subjects were extracted from consecutive patients with aortic dissection in the emergency department during 2019; the control subjects were extracted from consecutive patients without major aortic disease during 2019. 1:1 matching was performed for age, sex, and comorbidity, the prevalence of ductus diverticulum was compared, and conditional logistic regression was performed to reveal the association of ductus diverticulum and acute type B aortic dissection. In addition, the anatomic association between the ductus diverticulum and the primary entry tear was assessed in extracted cases, and baseline parameters were compared between dissection patients with or without ductus diverticulum.RESULTS:128 cases and 402 control subjects were extracted. 86 pairs were formed after matching, and the proportion of ductus diverticulum (19.8% vs 1.2%, p < 0.001) was higher in the case group. Conditional logistic regression revealed ductus diverticulum(OR = 22.04, 95%CI: 2.81-172.76, p = 0.003) as an independent predictor for acute type B aortic dissection. Besides, the ductus diverticulum has an anatomic association with the primary entry tear (OR = 4.22, 95%CI: 1.46-12.25, p = 0.008), and dissection patients with ductus diverticulum were younger (47.9 vs 54.4, p = 0.015) than dissection patients without ductus diverticulum.CONCLUSION:Ductus diverticulum is common in acute type B aortic dissection and is independently associated with acute type B aortic dissection.
Academic radiology 2023
OBJECTIVE:In the present report, we have described the outcomes of endovascular repair, hybrid arch repair, and open surgical repair for type B dissection involving the aortic arch (B1-2, D).METHODS:Cases of endovascular repair, hybrid arch repair, and open surgical repair performed between January 2015 and December 2019 for aortic dissection designated as B1-2, D by the Society for Vascular Surgery/Society of Thoracic Surgeons classification were retrospectively analyzed. The primary end point was all-cause mortality at follow-up. The secondary end points included early mortality, early morbidities, and aortic-related late events. Kaplan-Meier curves were created to analyze survival from all-cause mortality and freedom from aortic-related late events in the endovascular, hybrid, and open groups. Propensity score matching and stratification (stratified by proximal dissection extension: B1, D and B2, D) were performed as sensitivity analyses to compare the outcomes among the three treatment patterns after controlling for major confounders.RESULTS:The present study included 151 patients (men, 79.5%; mean age, 47.3 ± 10.5 years), with 72 (47.7%) in the endovascular group, 46 (30.5%) in the hybrid group, and 33 (21.8%) in the open group. No significant difference was noted in early mortality between the endovascular, hybrid, and open groups (1.4% vs 2.2% vs 3.0%; P = .791). The incidence of early endoleak was significantly greater (33.3% vs 13.0% vs 6.1%; P = .002) and the incidence of renal function deterioration was less (4.2% vs 26.1% vs 24.2%; P = .001) after endovascular repair vs hybrid arch repair and open surgery. After a median follow-up of 40.0 months (range, 0-84.0 months), no significant differences were found in all-cause mortality (5.6% vs 4.3% vs 3.0%; P = 1.0), aortic-related late events (16.7% vs 15.2% vs 12.1%; P = .834), or late endoleak (9.7% vs 4.3% vs 6.1%; P = .630) after endovascular, hybrid, and open surgery. The propensity score matching and stratification analyses displayed consistent outcomes for early mortality, all-cause mortality, and aortic-related late events among the three groups.CONCLUSIONS:The mid- to long-term outcomes after endovascular repair, hybrid arch repair, and open surgical repair for type B dissection involving the aortic arch (B1-2, D) were favorable and comparable in selected patients. Extensive experience and multidisciplinary teamwork are prerequisites for individualized strategies for repair of B1-2, D.
Journal of vascular surgery 2023
OBJECTIVE:In the present study, we have reported the midterm results of endovascular repair of acute zone 0 intramural hematomas (IMHs) with the most proximal tear or ulcer-like projection (ULP) in the descending aorta.METHODS:Data from patients with acute zone 0 IMH with the most proximal tear or ULP in the descending aorta from January 1, 2010, to December 31, 2019, were retrospectively reviewed. We performed Kaplan-Meier curves to calculate the intervention-free survival and survival after endovascular or open surgical repair. We used propensity score matching to compare the outcomes of endovascular and open surgical repair.RESULTS:The present study included 99 patients. Of the 99 patients, 34 had initially received medical treatment. The 0.5-, 1-, and 3-year intervention-free survival rates for the 34 patients were 23.5%, 17.6%, and 14.7%, respectively. Of the 99 patients, 51 had undergone endovascular therapy, 27 after initial medical treatment. Most of these 51 patients had had a maximal diameter of the ascending aorta of <50 mm and a maximal diameter of IMH in the ascending aorta of <10 mm. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival rate for the endovascular group was 98.0%. Finally, 42 patients had undergone open surgery (3 after medical treatment), and the 1-, 3-, 5-year survival rates were all 92.9%. After propensity score matching, no statistically significant difference was found in the 30-day and follow-up mortality. However, endovascular repair was associated with a shorter operation time (69 vs 314 minutes; P < .001), shorter length of intensive care unit stay (24 vs 70 hours; P = .001), and shorter length of hospital stay (7 vs 12 days; P = .011).CONCLUSIONS:For patients with acute zone 0 IMH and the most proximal tear or ULP in the descending aorta, in addition to open surgery, endovascular repair is an option if the maximal diameter of the ascending aorta is <50 mm and the maximal diameter of the IMH in the ascending aorta is <10 mm.
Journal of vascular surgery 2022
