陈星伟
中国医学科学院阜外医院 药剂科
BACKGROUND:Inappropriate antimicrobial use is common among patients undergoing surgery. It remains unclear whether a multi-faceted computerized antimicrobial stewardship programme is effective and safe in reducing inappropriate antimicrobial use in surgical settings.METHODS:A multi-faceted computerized antimicrobial stewardship intervention system was developed, and an open-label, cluster-randomized, controlled trial was conducted among 18 surgical teams that enrolled 2470 patients for open chest cardiovascular surgery. The surgical teams were divided at random into intervention and control groups at a ratio of 1:1. The primary endpoints were days of therapy (DOT)/1000 patient-days, defined daily dose (DDD)/1000 patient-days and length of therapy (LOT)/1000 patient-days.RESULTS:Mean DOT, DDD and LOT per 1000 patient-days were significantly lower in the intervention group compared with the control group (472.2 vs 539.8, 459.5 vs 553.8, and 438.4 vs 488.7; P<0.05), with reductions of 14.2% [95% confidence interval (CI) 11.8-16.7%], 18.7% (95% CI 15.9-21.4%) and 11.9% (95% CI 9.6-14.1%), respectively. The daily risk of inappropriate antimicrobial use after discharge from the intensive care unit decreased by 23.9% [95% CI 15.5-31.5% (incidence risk ratio 0.76, 95% CI 0.69-0.85)] in the intervention group. There was no significant difference in rates of infection or surgical-related complications between the groups. Median antimicrobial costs were significantly lower in the intervention group {873.4 [interquartile range (IQR) 684.5-1255.4] RMB vs 1178.7 (IQR 869.1-1814.5) RMB; P<0.001} (1 RMB approximately equivalent to 0.16 US$ in 2022).CONCLUSIONS:The multi-faceted computerized antimicrobial stewardship interventions reduced inappropriate antimicrobial use safely.CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION:Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT04328090.
International journal of antimicrobial agents 2023
INTRODUCTION:Inappropriate antimicrobial use increases the prevalence of antimicrobial-resistant bacteria. Surgeons are reluctant to implement recommendations of guidelines in clinical practice. Antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) is effective in antimicrobial management, but it remains labour intensive. The computerised decision support system (CDSS) has been identified as an effective way to enable key elements of AMS in clinical settings. However, insufficient evidence is available to evaluate the efficacy of computerised AMS in surgical settings.METHODS AND ANALYSIS:The Evaluate of the Potential Impact of Computerised AMS trial is an open-label, single-centre, two-arm, cluster-randomised, controlled trial, which aims to determine whether a multicomponent CDSS intervention reduces overall antimicrobial use after cardiovascular surgeries compared with usual clinical care in a specialty hospital with a big volume of cardiovascular surgeries. Eighteen cardiovascular surgical teams will be randomised 1:1 to either the intervention or the control arm. The intervention will consist of (1) re-evaluation alerts and decision support for the duration of antimicrobial treatment decision, (2) re-evaluation alerts and decision support for the choice of antimicrobial, (3) quality control audit and feedback. The primary outcome will be the overall systemic antimicrobial use measured in days of therapy (DOT) per admission and DOT per 1000 patient-days over the whole intervention period (6 months). Secondary outcomes include a series of indices to evaluate antimicrobial use, microbial resistance, perioperative infection outcomes, patient safety, resource consumption, and user compliance and satisfaction.ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION:The Ethics Committee in Fuwai Hospital approved this study (2020-1329). The results of the trial will be submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed journal.TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER:NCT04328090.
BMJ open 2020
