Effect of chemotherapy in tumor on coronary arteries: Mechanisms and management.

Coronary artery disease (CAD) is an important contributor to the cardiovascular burden in cancer survivors. The development of coronary ischemia events, myocardial infarction, and heart failure has been associated with many conventional chemotherapeutic agents, new targeted therapies, and immunotherapy. The most frequent pathological manifestations of chemotherapy-mediated coronary damage include acute vasospasm, acute thrombosis, accelerated atherosclerosis development, and microvascular dysfunction. Potential screening techniques for CAD patients include baseline risk factor evaluation, polygenic risk factors, and coronary artery calcium scores. Determining the risk requires consideration of both the type of chemotherapy and the type of cancer being treated. Cardiology-oncology guidelines offer some suggestions for the care of coronary artery disease, which might involve medication, lifestyle changes, and coronary revascularization.

Prolonged Dual Antiplatelet Therapy in Acute Myocardial Infarction Patients Without Revascularization: China Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry Study.

At least 12 months of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) is 1 of the standards of care following percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute coronary syndrome. However, study on prolonged DAPT for patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) without revascularization is limited. We studied 1,744 patients with AMI without revascularization from the China Acute Myocardial Infarction registry between January 2013 and September 2014. These patients were on DAPT and did not experience AMI, stroke, or bleeding events at the 12-month follow-up. We divided them into 2 groups: 12-month DAPT group (DAPT for at least 12 months but <18 months) and 18-month DAPT group (DAPT for at least 18 months). The primary outcome was 24-month all-cause death. Overall, 1,221 patients (70.0%) took DAPT for ≥12 months but <18 months, whereas 523 patients (30.0%) took DAPT for ≥18 months. The proportion of patients at high ischemic risk and the proportion of patients at high bleeding risk were similar in the 2 groups. At 24 months, the all-cause mortality rate of the 18-month DAPT group was significantly lower than that for the 12-month DAPT group (3.7% vs 5.9%, p = 0.0471). The adjusted hazard ratio for all-cause death also showed statistical significance (0.59, 95% confidence interval 0.35 to 0.99, p = 0.0444). In conclusion, DAPT for at least 18 months appears to be associated with lower 24-month mortality for non-revascularization AMI patients without events within 12 months after onset.

Meta-Analysis Global Group in Chronic Heart Failure score for the prediction of mortality in valvular heart disease.

AIMS:Valvular heart disease (VHD) is one of the leading causes of heart failure. Clinically significant VHD can induce different patterns of cardiac remodelling, and risk stratification is challenging in patients with various degrees of cardiac dysfunction. The study aimed to investigate the prognostic implications of Meta-Analysis Global Group in Chronic Heart Failure (MAGGIC) score in patients with VHD.METHODS AND RESULTS:This study used data from the China Valvular Heart Disease (China-VHD) registry, which was a multicentre, prospective, observational cohort study for patients with significant (at least moderate) VHD. In total, 10 446 patients with moderate or greater VHD from the China-VHD study were included in the present analysis. The primary outcome of interest was all-cause mortality within 2 years. Among 10 446 patients with VHD, the mean age was 61.98 ± 13.47 years, and 5819 (55.7%) were male. During 2 years of follow-up, 895 (8.6%) patients died. The MAGGIC score was monotonically and independently associated with mortality in both total cohort [adjusted hazard ratio: 1.095, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.084-1.107, P < 0.001] and most types of VHD (aortic regurgitation, mitral stenosis, mitral regurgitation, tricuspid regurgitation, mixed aortic stenosis and aortic regurgitation, and multiple VHD). The score was also an independent prognostic factor in patients with or without symptoms or preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and exhibited both satisfactory discrimination and calibration properties in predicting mortality. The prognostic value of MAGGIC score was robust in most quartiles of N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide level, with no significant interaction observed (Pinteraction  = 0.498). Compared with the EuroSCORE II, the MAGGIC score achieved significantly better predictive performance in overall population [C index: 0.769 vs. 0.727; net reclassification improvement index (95% CI): 0.354 (0.313-0.396), P < 0.001; integrated discrimination improvement index (95% CI): 0.069 (0.052-0.085), P < 0.001] and in subgroups of patients divided by therapeutic strategy, LVEF, symptomatic status, stage of VHD, and aetiology of VHD.CONCLUSIONS:The MAGGIC score is a reliable prognostic factor across the range of cardiac dysfunction in VHD and may assist in risk stratification and guide clinical decision-making.

Prognostic effect of stress hyperglycemia ratio on patients with severe aortic stenosis receiving transcatheter aortic valve replacement: a prospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND:Stress hyperglycemia ratio (SHR) has recently been recognized as a novel biomarker that accurately reflects acute hyperglycemia status and is associated with poor prognosis of heart failure. We evaluated the relationship between SHR and clinical outcomes in patients with severe aortic stenosis receiving transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR).METHODS:There were 582 patients with severe native aortic stenosis who underwent TAVR consecutively enrolled in the study. The formula used to determine SHR was as follows: admission blood glucose (mmol/L)/(1.59×HbA1c[%]-2.59). The primary endpoint was defined as all-cause mortality, while secondary endpoints included a composite of cardiovascular mortality or readmission for heart failure, and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) including cardiovascular mortality, non-fatal myocardial infarction, and non-fatal stroke. Multivariable Cox regression and restricted cubic spline analysis were employed to assess the relationship between SHR and endpoints, with hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).RESULTS:During a median follow-up of 3.9 years, a total of 130 cases (22.3%) of all-cause mortality were recorded. Results from the restricted cubic spline analysis indicated a linear association between SHR and all endpoints (p for non-linearity > 0.05), even after adjustment for other confounding factors. Per 0.1 unit increase in SHR was associated with a 12% (adjusted HR: 1.12, 95% CI: 1.04-1.21) higher incidence of the primary endpoint, a 12% (adjusted HR: 1.12, 95% CI: 1.02-1.22) higher incidence of cardiovascular mortality or readmission for heart failure, and a 12% (adjusted HR: 1.12, 95% CI: 1.01-1.23) higher incidence of MACE. Subgroup analysis revealed that SHR had a significant interaction with diabetes mellitus with regard to the risk of all-cause mortality (p for interaction: 0.042). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed that there were significant differences in the incidence of all endpoints between the two groups with 0.944 as the optimal binary cutoff point of SHR (all log-rank test: p < 0.05).CONCLUSIONS:Our study indicates linear relationships of SHR with the risk of all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality or readmission for heart failure, and MACE in patients with severe aortic stenosis receiving TAVR after a median follow-up of 3.9 years. Patients with an SHR exceeding 0.944 had a poorer prognosis compared to those with lower SHR values.

Prevalence and impact of diabetes in patients with valvular heart disease.

This study aimed to investigate the prevalence of diabetes in valvular heart disease (VHD), as well as the relationship of diabetes with severity of valvular lesions and clinical outcome. A total of 11,862 patients with significant (≥moderate) VHD from the China Valvular Heart Disease study were included in the analysis. The primary outcome was the composite of all-cause death, hospitalization for heart failure, and myocardial infarction during two-year follow-up. The prevalence of diabetes was 14.5% (1,721/11,862) in VHD. After adjusting for patients' demographics, diabetes was associated with a significantly lower risk of severe valvular lesion in aortic regurgitation and mitral regurgitation (MR). In multivariable analysis, diabetes was identified as an independent predictor of two-year outcome in patients with MR (hazard ratio: 1.345, 95% confidence interval: 1.069-1.692, p = 0.011). More efforts should be made to enhance our understanding and improve outcomes of concomitant VHD and diabetes.

Diagnostic performance of intravascular ultrasound-based fractional flow reserve in evaluating of intermediate left main stenosis.

BACKGROUND:The recently introduced ultrasonic flow ratio (UFR), is a novel fast computational method to derive fractional flow reserve (FFR) from intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) images. In the present study, we evaluate the diagnostic performance of UFR in patients with intermediate left main (LM) stenosis.METHODS:This is a prospective, single center study enrolling consecutive patients with presence of intermediated LM lesions (diameter stenosis of 30%-80% by visual estimation) underwent IVUS and FFR measurement. An independent core laboratory assessed offline UFR and IVUS-derived minimal lumen area (MLA) in a blinded fashion.RESULTS:Both UFR and FFR were successfully achieved in 41 LM patients (mean age, 62.0 ± 9.9 years, 46.3% diabetes). An acceptable correlation between UFR and FFR was identified (r = 0.688, P < 0.0001), with an absolute numerical difference of 0.03 (standard difference: 0.01). The area under the curve (AUC) in diagnosis of physiologically significant coronary stenosis for UFR was 0.94 (95% CI: 0.87-1.01), which was significantly higher than angiographic identified stenosis > 50% (AUC = 0.66, P < 0.001) and numerically higher than IVUS-derived MLA (AUC = 0.82; P = 0.09). Patient level diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity and specificity for UFR to identify FFR ≤ 0.80 was 82.9% (95% CI: 70.2-95.7), 93.1% (95% CI: 82.2-100.0), 58.3% (95% CI: 26.3-90.4), respectively.CONCLUSION:In patients with intermediate LM diseases, UFR was proved to be associated with acceptable correlation and high accuracy with pressure wire-based FFR as standard reference. The present study supports the use of UFR for functional evaluation of intermediate LM stenosis.

Diagnostic performance of ultrasonic flow ratio versus quantitative flow ratio for assessment of coronary stenosis.

BACKGROUND:Ultrasonic flow ratio (UFR) is a novel intravascular ultrasound (IVUS)-derived modality for fast computation of fractional flow reserve (FFR) without pressure wires and adenosine.AIMS:This study was sought to compare the diagnostic performance of UFR and quantitative flow ratio (QFR), using FFR as the reference standard.METHODS:This is a retrospective study enrolling consecutive patients with intermediate coronary artery lesions (diameter stenosis of 30%-90% by visual estimation) for IVUS and FFR measurement. UFR and QFR were performed offline in a core-lab by independent analysts blinded to FFR.RESULTS:From December 2022 to May 2023, a total of 78 eligible patients were enrolled. IVUS and FFR measurements were successfully conducted in 104 vessels, finally 98 vessels with both FFR, UFR and QFR evaluation were analyzed. Mean FFR was 0.79 ± 0.12. UFR showed a strong correlation with FFR similar to QFR (r = 0.83 vs. 0.82, p = 0.795). Diagnostic accuracy of UFR was non-inferior to QFR (94% [89%-97%] versus 90% [84%-94%], p = 0.113). Sensitivity and specificity in identifying hemodynamically significant stenosis were comparable between UFR and QFR (sensitivity: 89% [79%-96%] versus 85% [74%-92%], p = 0.453; specificity: 97% [91%-99%] versus 95% [88%-99%], p = 0.625). The area under curve for UFR was 0.95 [0.90-0.98], non-inferior to QFR (difference = 0.021, p = 0.293), and significantly higher than minimum lumen area (MLA; difference = 0.13, p < 0.001). Diagnostic accuracy of UFR and QFR was not statically different in bifurcation nor non-bifurcation lesions.CONCLUSIONS:UFR showed excellent concordance with FFR, non-inferior to QFR, superior to MLA. UFR provides a potentiality for the integration of physiological assessment and intravascular imaging in clinical practice.

A Novel System for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation: First-in-Man Study.

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has become a therapeutic treatment for severe symptomatic patients with aortic stenosis. This study aimed to test a novel transcatheter aortic self-expandable bioprosthesis-the ScienCrown system (Lepu Medtech Inc., Beijing, China)-and evaluate the safety of the new device during TAVI. ScienCrown aortic valve implantation was performed on 10 patients. Clinical assessment was performed at baseline, post procedure, and after 1 year. Clinical outcomes and adverse events were assessed according to Valvular Academic Research Consortium-3 criteria. The mean age was 75.30 ± 4.78 years with a mean Society of Thoracic Surgeons score of 4.64 ± 3.23%. Device success was achieved in all patients (80% transfemoral, 20% transapical). After 1 year, there were no deaths, disabling strokes, myocardial infarctions, conversions to surgery, or major procedure-related complications. New pacemaker implantation was required in one patient (10%). ScienCrown implantation resulted in a reduction in mean valve gradient (63.00 ± 18.84 to 9.67 ± 4.97 mm Hg, p <0.001) and an increase in effective orifice area (0.57 ± 0.20 to 2.57 ± 0.59 cm2, p <0.001) at 1 year. Paravalvular leak was absent in 9 patients (90%), and there was a trace in one patient (10%). All patients were in New York Heart Association class I to II at a mean follow-up of 1 year. The experience showed that ScienCrown transcatheter aortic valve system was safely and successfully implanted for treatment of severe symptomatic aortic stenosis. The newer-generation device affords a stable implantation while providing optimal hemodynamic performance.

Assessing causal relationship between non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and risk of atrial fibrillation.

Long-term clinical outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention for ostial left main coronary artery disease.

BACKGROUND:There are limited data regarding the long-term prognosis of percutaneous coronary intervention treatment for left main (LM) ostial stenosis.AIMS:The present study sought to investigate the long-term clinical outcomes and risk factors for adverse events in LM ostial lesions following drug-eluting stent implantation (DES) in a large cohort of an LM registry database.METHODS:Patients presenting with LM coronary disease from January 2004 to December 2016 at Fuwai Hospital were included. The primary endpoint was target vessel failure (TVF), a composite endpoint of cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction and target vessel revascularisation. Cox proportional hazards models were constructed to identify independent predictors.RESULTS:Among 4,625 LM patients, 627 (13.6%) patients were identified with LM ostial lesions. There were more female patients in the ostial group (31.3%), compared with the shaft (18.1%) and bifurcation groups (19.9%) (p<0.0001). Among patients with DES implantation, 3-year TVF occurred in 44 patients (7.5%) in the ostial group, which is comparable with the other two groups. Myocardial infarction (MI) was significantly lower in the ostial group (2.0%) compared with the bifurcation group (4.2%) (p=0.02), especially for MI events originating in the LM vessel (p=0.02). For patients with ostial LM disease who received percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) treatment, procedural complications were an independent risk factor for long-term cardiac death or MI, while a more recent PCI proved to be a protective factor.CONCLUSIONS:PCI treatment for ostial LM lesions achieved favourable long-term outcomes, with a similar MI risk compared with the mid-shaft group but a significantly lower risk of MI compared with the distal group.

Effect of chemotherapy in tumor on coronary arteries: Mechanisms and management.

Coronary artery disease (CAD) is an important contributor to the cardiovascular burden in cancer survivors. The development of coronary ischemia events, myocardial infarction, and heart failure has been associated with many conventional chemotherapeutic agents, new targeted therapies, and immunotherapy. The most frequent pathological manifestations of chemotherapy-mediated coronary damage include acute vasospasm, acute thrombosis, accelerated atherosclerosis development, and microvascular dysfunction. Potential screening techniques for CAD patients include baseline risk factor evaluation, polygenic risk factors, and coronary artery calcium scores. Determining the risk requires consideration of both the type of chemotherapy and the type of cancer being treated. Cardiology-oncology guidelines offer some suggestions for the care of coronary artery disease, which might involve medication, lifestyle changes, and coronary revascularization.

Prolonged Dual Antiplatelet Therapy in Acute Myocardial Infarction Patients Without Revascularization: China Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry Study.

At least 12 months of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) is 1 of the standards of care following percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute coronary syndrome. However, study on prolonged DAPT for patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) without revascularization is limited. We studied 1,744 patients with AMI without revascularization from the China Acute Myocardial Infarction registry between January 2013 and September 2014. These patients were on DAPT and did not experience AMI, stroke, or bleeding events at the 12-month follow-up. We divided them into 2 groups: 12-month DAPT group (DAPT for at least 12 months but <18 months) and 18-month DAPT group (DAPT for at least 18 months). The primary outcome was 24-month all-cause death. Overall, 1,221 patients (70.0%) took DAPT for ≥12 months but <18 months, whereas 523 patients (30.0%) took DAPT for ≥18 months. The proportion of patients at high ischemic risk and the proportion of patients at high bleeding risk were similar in the 2 groups. At 24 months, the all-cause mortality rate of the 18-month DAPT group was significantly lower than that for the 12-month DAPT group (3.7% vs 5.9%, p = 0.0471). The adjusted hazard ratio for all-cause death also showed statistical significance (0.59, 95% confidence interval 0.35 to 0.99, p = 0.0444). In conclusion, DAPT for at least 18 months appears to be associated with lower 24-month mortality for non-revascularization AMI patients without events within 12 months after onset.

Meta-Analysis Global Group in Chronic Heart Failure score for the prediction of mortality in valvular heart disease.

AIMS:Valvular heart disease (VHD) is one of the leading causes of heart failure. Clinically significant VHD can induce different patterns of cardiac remodelling, and risk stratification is challenging in patients with various degrees of cardiac dysfunction. The study aimed to investigate the prognostic implications of Meta-Analysis Global Group in Chronic Heart Failure (MAGGIC) score in patients with VHD.METHODS AND RESULTS:This study used data from the China Valvular Heart Disease (China-VHD) registry, which was a multicentre, prospective, observational cohort study for patients with significant (at least moderate) VHD. In total, 10 446 patients with moderate or greater VHD from the China-VHD study were included in the present analysis. The primary outcome of interest was all-cause mortality within 2 years. Among 10 446 patients with VHD, the mean age was 61.98 ± 13.47 years, and 5819 (55.7%) were male. During 2 years of follow-up, 895 (8.6%) patients died. The MAGGIC score was monotonically and independently associated with mortality in both total cohort [adjusted hazard ratio: 1.095, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.084-1.107, P < 0.001] and most types of VHD (aortic regurgitation, mitral stenosis, mitral regurgitation, tricuspid regurgitation, mixed aortic stenosis and aortic regurgitation, and multiple VHD). The score was also an independent prognostic factor in patients with or without symptoms or preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and exhibited both satisfactory discrimination and calibration properties in predicting mortality. The prognostic value of MAGGIC score was robust in most quartiles of N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide level, with no significant interaction observed (Pinteraction  = 0.498). Compared with the EuroSCORE II, the MAGGIC score achieved significantly better predictive performance in overall population [C index: 0.769 vs. 0.727; net reclassification improvement index (95% CI): 0.354 (0.313-0.396), P < 0.001; integrated discrimination improvement index (95% CI): 0.069 (0.052-0.085), P < 0.001] and in subgroups of patients divided by therapeutic strategy, LVEF, symptomatic status, stage of VHD, and aetiology of VHD.CONCLUSIONS:The MAGGIC score is a reliable prognostic factor across the range of cardiac dysfunction in VHD and may assist in risk stratification and guide clinical decision-making.

Prognostic effect of stress hyperglycemia ratio on patients with severe aortic stenosis receiving transcatheter aortic valve replacement: a prospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND:Stress hyperglycemia ratio (SHR) has recently been recognized as a novel biomarker that accurately reflects acute hyperglycemia status and is associated with poor prognosis of heart failure. We evaluated the relationship between SHR and clinical outcomes in patients with severe aortic stenosis receiving transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR).METHODS:There were 582 patients with severe native aortic stenosis who underwent TAVR consecutively enrolled in the study. The formula used to determine SHR was as follows: admission blood glucose (mmol/L)/(1.59×HbA1c[%]-2.59). The primary endpoint was defined as all-cause mortality, while secondary endpoints included a composite of cardiovascular mortality or readmission for heart failure, and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) including cardiovascular mortality, non-fatal myocardial infarction, and non-fatal stroke. Multivariable Cox regression and restricted cubic spline analysis were employed to assess the relationship between SHR and endpoints, with hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).RESULTS:During a median follow-up of 3.9 years, a total of 130 cases (22.3%) of all-cause mortality were recorded. Results from the restricted cubic spline analysis indicated a linear association between SHR and all endpoints (p for non-linearity > 0.05), even after adjustment for other confounding factors. Per 0.1 unit increase in SHR was associated with a 12% (adjusted HR: 1.12, 95% CI: 1.04-1.21) higher incidence of the primary endpoint, a 12% (adjusted HR: 1.12, 95% CI: 1.02-1.22) higher incidence of cardiovascular mortality or readmission for heart failure, and a 12% (adjusted HR: 1.12, 95% CI: 1.01-1.23) higher incidence of MACE. Subgroup analysis revealed that SHR had a significant interaction with diabetes mellitus with regard to the risk of all-cause mortality (p for interaction: 0.042). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed that there were significant differences in the incidence of all endpoints between the two groups with 0.944 as the optimal binary cutoff point of SHR (all log-rank test: p < 0.05).CONCLUSIONS:Our study indicates linear relationships of SHR with the risk of all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality or readmission for heart failure, and MACE in patients with severe aortic stenosis receiving TAVR after a median follow-up of 3.9 years. Patients with an SHR exceeding 0.944 had a poorer prognosis compared to those with lower SHR values.

Prevalence and impact of diabetes in patients with valvular heart disease.

This study aimed to investigate the prevalence of diabetes in valvular heart disease (VHD), as well as the relationship of diabetes with severity of valvular lesions and clinical outcome. A total of 11,862 patients with significant (≥moderate) VHD from the China Valvular Heart Disease study were included in the analysis. The primary outcome was the composite of all-cause death, hospitalization for heart failure, and myocardial infarction during two-year follow-up. The prevalence of diabetes was 14.5% (1,721/11,862) in VHD. After adjusting for patients' demographics, diabetes was associated with a significantly lower risk of severe valvular lesion in aortic regurgitation and mitral regurgitation (MR). In multivariable analysis, diabetes was identified as an independent predictor of two-year outcome in patients with MR (hazard ratio: 1.345, 95% confidence interval: 1.069-1.692, p = 0.011). More efforts should be made to enhance our understanding and improve outcomes of concomitant VHD and diabetes.

Diagnostic performance of intravascular ultrasound-based fractional flow reserve in evaluating of intermediate left main stenosis.

BACKGROUND:The recently introduced ultrasonic flow ratio (UFR), is a novel fast computational method to derive fractional flow reserve (FFR) from intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) images. In the present study, we evaluate the diagnostic performance of UFR in patients with intermediate left main (LM) stenosis.METHODS:This is a prospective, single center study enrolling consecutive patients with presence of intermediated LM lesions (diameter stenosis of 30%-80% by visual estimation) underwent IVUS and FFR measurement. An independent core laboratory assessed offline UFR and IVUS-derived minimal lumen area (MLA) in a blinded fashion.RESULTS:Both UFR and FFR were successfully achieved in 41 LM patients (mean age, 62.0 ± 9.9 years, 46.3% diabetes). An acceptable correlation between UFR and FFR was identified (r = 0.688, P < 0.0001), with an absolute numerical difference of 0.03 (standard difference: 0.01). The area under the curve (AUC) in diagnosis of physiologically significant coronary stenosis for UFR was 0.94 (95% CI: 0.87-1.01), which was significantly higher than angiographic identified stenosis > 50% (AUC = 0.66, P < 0.001) and numerically higher than IVUS-derived MLA (AUC = 0.82; P = 0.09). Patient level diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity and specificity for UFR to identify FFR ≤ 0.80 was 82.9% (95% CI: 70.2-95.7), 93.1% (95% CI: 82.2-100.0), 58.3% (95% CI: 26.3-90.4), respectively.CONCLUSION:In patients with intermediate LM diseases, UFR was proved to be associated with acceptable correlation and high accuracy with pressure wire-based FFR as standard reference. The present study supports the use of UFR for functional evaluation of intermediate LM stenosis.

Diagnostic performance of ultrasonic flow ratio versus quantitative flow ratio for assessment of coronary stenosis.

BACKGROUND:Ultrasonic flow ratio (UFR) is a novel intravascular ultrasound (IVUS)-derived modality for fast computation of fractional flow reserve (FFR) without pressure wires and adenosine.AIMS:This study was sought to compare the diagnostic performance of UFR and quantitative flow ratio (QFR), using FFR as the reference standard.METHODS:This is a retrospective study enrolling consecutive patients with intermediate coronary artery lesions (diameter stenosis of 30%-90% by visual estimation) for IVUS and FFR measurement. UFR and QFR were performed offline in a core-lab by independent analysts blinded to FFR.RESULTS:From December 2022 to May 2023, a total of 78 eligible patients were enrolled. IVUS and FFR measurements were successfully conducted in 104 vessels, finally 98 vessels with both FFR, UFR and QFR evaluation were analyzed. Mean FFR was 0.79 ± 0.12. UFR showed a strong correlation with FFR similar to QFR (r = 0.83 vs. 0.82, p = 0.795). Diagnostic accuracy of UFR was non-inferior to QFR (94% [89%-97%] versus 90% [84%-94%], p = 0.113). Sensitivity and specificity in identifying hemodynamically significant stenosis were comparable between UFR and QFR (sensitivity: 89% [79%-96%] versus 85% [74%-92%], p = 0.453; specificity: 97% [91%-99%] versus 95% [88%-99%], p = 0.625). The area under curve for UFR was 0.95 [0.90-0.98], non-inferior to QFR (difference = 0.021, p = 0.293), and significantly higher than minimum lumen area (MLA; difference = 0.13, p < 0.001). Diagnostic accuracy of UFR and QFR was not statically different in bifurcation nor non-bifurcation lesions.CONCLUSIONS:UFR showed excellent concordance with FFR, non-inferior to QFR, superior to MLA. UFR provides a potentiality for the integration of physiological assessment and intravascular imaging in clinical practice.

A Novel System for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation: First-in-Man Study.

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has become a therapeutic treatment for severe symptomatic patients with aortic stenosis. This study aimed to test a novel transcatheter aortic self-expandable bioprosthesis-the ScienCrown system (Lepu Medtech Inc., Beijing, China)-and evaluate the safety of the new device during TAVI. ScienCrown aortic valve implantation was performed on 10 patients. Clinical assessment was performed at baseline, post procedure, and after 1 year. Clinical outcomes and adverse events were assessed according to Valvular Academic Research Consortium-3 criteria. The mean age was 75.30 ± 4.78 years with a mean Society of Thoracic Surgeons score of 4.64 ± 3.23%. Device success was achieved in all patients (80% transfemoral, 20% transapical). After 1 year, there were no deaths, disabling strokes, myocardial infarctions, conversions to surgery, or major procedure-related complications. New pacemaker implantation was required in one patient (10%). ScienCrown implantation resulted in a reduction in mean valve gradient (63.00 ± 18.84 to 9.67 ± 4.97 mm Hg, p <0.001) and an increase in effective orifice area (0.57 ± 0.20 to 2.57 ± 0.59 cm2, p <0.001) at 1 year. Paravalvular leak was absent in 9 patients (90%), and there was a trace in one patient (10%). All patients were in New York Heart Association class I to II at a mean follow-up of 1 year. The experience showed that ScienCrown transcatheter aortic valve system was safely and successfully implanted for treatment of severe symptomatic aortic stenosis. The newer-generation device affords a stable implantation while providing optimal hemodynamic performance.

Assessing causal relationship between non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and risk of atrial fibrillation.

Long-term clinical outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention for ostial left main coronary artery disease.

BACKGROUND:There are limited data regarding the long-term prognosis of percutaneous coronary intervention treatment for left main (LM) ostial stenosis.AIMS:The present study sought to investigate the long-term clinical outcomes and risk factors for adverse events in LM ostial lesions following drug-eluting stent implantation (DES) in a large cohort of an LM registry database.METHODS:Patients presenting with LM coronary disease from January 2004 to December 2016 at Fuwai Hospital were included. The primary endpoint was target vessel failure (TVF), a composite endpoint of cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction and target vessel revascularisation. Cox proportional hazards models were constructed to identify independent predictors.RESULTS:Among 4,625 LM patients, 627 (13.6%) patients were identified with LM ostial lesions. There were more female patients in the ostial group (31.3%), compared with the shaft (18.1%) and bifurcation groups (19.9%) (p<0.0001). Among patients with DES implantation, 3-year TVF occurred in 44 patients (7.5%) in the ostial group, which is comparable with the other two groups. Myocardial infarction (MI) was significantly lower in the ostial group (2.0%) compared with the bifurcation group (4.2%) (p=0.02), especially for MI events originating in the LM vessel (p=0.02). For patients with ostial LM disease who received percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) treatment, procedural complications were an independent risk factor for long-term cardiac death or MI, while a more recent PCI proved to be a protective factor.CONCLUSIONS:PCI treatment for ostial LM lesions achieved favourable long-term outcomes, with a similar MI risk compared with the mid-shaft group but a significantly lower risk of MI compared with the distal group.