李鸣瑶
中国医学科学院阜外医院 超声科
OBJECTIVE:The objective of this study was to introduce our institutional experience of treatment strategies (cervical subclavian artery reconstruction, thoracotomy subclavian artery reconstruction and endovascular treatment) for proximal isolated subclavian artery aneurysms (PISAAs).METHODS:we retrospectively analyzed 15 consecutive patients with PISAAs treated by different treatment strategies (cervical reconstruction, thoracotomy reconstruction and endovascular treatment) in our institution from May 2016 to May 2022. Baseline data, surgery-related data, postoperative information and long-term follow-up were assessed.RESULTS:A total of 17 PISAAs in 15 consecutive patients were treated in our institution. The success rates of subclavian artery reconstruction in the cervical reconstruction, the thoracotomy reconstruction and the endovascular treatment were 100%, 100 and 83.33%, respectively. About the involved vertebral artery, the reconstruction rates in the cervical reconstruction, the thoracotomy reconstruction, and the endovascular treatment were 80%, 75%, and 0, respectively. The intraoperative blood loss in the thoracotomy reconstruction was significantly higher than that in the cervical reconstruction and the endovascular treatment (p<0.05). The total operation time of the thoracotomy reconstruction was significantly longer than that of the cervical reconstruction and the endovascular treatment (p<0.05). In terms of postoperative ventilator use time, total postoperative drainage fluid, total postoperative drainage time, and ICU duration, both the thoracotomy reconstruction and the cervical reconstruction were significantly more than the endovascular treatment (p<0.05). During the follow-up, one patient in the endovascular treatment underwent re-intervention 22 months after surgery due to in-stent occlusion.CONCLUSIONS:For patients with PISAAs, different treatment strategies are recommended depending on the size of the aneurysms and whether the involved vertebral arteries require reconstruction.CLINICAL IMPACT:This article is the largest study on the treatment strategies of PISAAs. By comparing the prognosis and complications of endovascular treatment with those of open surgery, it provides a certain reference basis for the choice of treatment for patients with PISAAs. For patients with aneurysms' diameter of >50 mm, the thoracotomy subclavian artery reconstruction is recommended; for patients with aneurysms' diameter of <30 mm requiring reconstruction of the involved vertebral arteries, the cervical subclavian artery reconstruction is recommended; for patients with aneurysms' diameter of <30 mm not requiring reconstruction of the involved vertebral arteries, the endovascular treatment is recommended.
Journal of endovascular therapy : an official journal of the International Society of Endovascular Specialists 2023
BACKGROUND:The recommendation of the European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS) is that vertebral revascularization combined with ipsilateral CEA (carotid endarterectomy) should not be performed in the same operation. ESVS believes that vertebral revascularization combined with ipsilateral CEA increases perioperative death/stroke rates. In our opinion, revascularization of the first segment of vertebral artery (V1) combined with ipsilateral CEA is safe compared to vertebral V1 revascularization in the perioperative period. The purpose of this study is to prove that revascularization of V1 segment of vertebral artery combined with ipsilateral CEA is secure in the perioperative period.METHODS:We describe our experience with homochronous revascularization of V1 segment of vertebral artery with ipsilateral CEA (group B) and simple revascularization of V1 segment of vertebral artery (group A) in 48 consecutive patients during a 5-year period. O.Y. (Ouyang) incisions were used in both groups. We compare the results of the 2 procedures with aspects of mortality, stroke, morbidity, incident rates of complications, and so on.RESULTS:There was no significant difference between patients in group A and group B in terms of red blood cell reduction, postoperative ventilator using time, postoperative drainage volume, postoperative drainage days, postoperative hospitalize duration, and incident rates of postoperative complications. The postoperative complications include death, stroke, Horner syndrome, vocal paralysis, hypoglossal nerve paralysis, wound hematomas, and lymphatic leakage.CONCLUSIONS:Revascularization of vertebral artery combined with ipsilateral CEA should be divided into revascularization of V1 segment of vertebral artery combined with ipsilateral CEA and revascularization of V3 segment of vertebral artery with ipsilateral CEA. Revascularization of V1 segment of vertebral artery combined with ipsilateral CEA is safe; it can be performed for suitable patients who are fit for indications. O.Y. incisions can fully expose the target blood vessels and simplify the procedures without transecting the sternocleidomastoid muscles in operations.
Annals of vascular surgery 2023
